Development of an Assessment Tool To Measure Students' Meaningful Learning in the Undergraduate Chemistry Laboratory

被引:94
作者
Galloway, Kelli R. [1 ]
Bretz, Stacey Lowery [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Chemistry Education Research; Assessment; Laboratory Instruction; First-Year Undergraduate; Second-Year Undergraduate; Organic Chemistry; Hands-On Learning; Learning Theories; INSTRUCTION; INSTRUMENT; SCIENCE; ATTITUDE; VALIDATION; EDUCATION; GOALS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1021/ed500881y
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Research on learning in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory necessitates an understanding of students' perspectives of learning. Novak's Theory of Meaningful Learning states that the cognitive (thinking), affective (feeling), and psychomotor (doing) domains must be integrated for meaningful learning to occur. The psychomotor domain is the essence of the chemistry laboratory, but the extent to which the cognitive and affective domains are integrated into the laboratory is unknown. For meaningful learning to occur in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory, students must actively integrate both the cognitive domain and the affective domains into the "doing" of their laboratory work. The Meaningful Learning in the Laboratory Instrument (MLLI) was designed to measure students' expectations before and after laboratory courses and experiences, in both the cognitive and affective domains, within the context of conducting experiments in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. The MLLI was pilot-tested and modified based on an analysis of the pilot study data. The revised, 31-item MLLI was administered online both at the beginning and end of a semester to both general and organic chemistry laboratory students. Evidence for both the validity and reliability of the data, as well as comparisons between general and organic chemistry students' responses, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1149 / 1158
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], JOINT COMM STAND ED
[2]  
[Anonymous], EXPLAINING PSYCHOL S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, LEARNING CREATING US
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering
[5]   Understanding the State of the Art for Measurement in Chemistry Education Research: Examining the Psychometric Evidence [J].
Arjoon, Janelle A. ;
Xu, Xiaoying ;
Lewis, Jennifer E. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 90 (05) :536-545
[6]  
Barbera J, 2008, J CHEM EDUC, V85, P1435
[7]   Beyond "student attitudes": Chemistry self-concept inventory for assessment of the affective component of student learning [J].
Bauer, CF .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 82 (12) :1864-1870
[8]   Attitude towards chemistry: A semantic differential instrument for assessing curriculum impacts [J].
Bauer, Christopher F. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 85 (10) :1440-1445
[9]   Development and score validation of a Chemistry Laboratory Anxiety Instrument (CLAI) for college chemistry students [J].
Bowen, CW .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1999, 59 (01) :171-185
[10]   Modeling meaningful learning in chemistry using structural equation modeling [J].
Brandriet, Alexandra R. ;
Ward, Rose Marie ;
Bretz, Stacey Lowery .
CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2013, 14 (04) :421-430