Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection

被引:219
作者
White, Corey N. [1 ]
Ratcliff, Roger [2 ]
Starns, Jeffrey J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78705 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
Diffusion model; Flanker task; Visual attention; Model selection; Dual process; Single process; VISUAL-ATTENTION; RESPONSE-TIME; LETTER IDENTIFICATION; INFORMATION; MEMORY; AUTOMATICITY; ACTIVATION; RETRIEVAL; SPOTLIGHT; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study tested diffusion models of processing in the flanker task, in which participants identify a target that is flanked by items that indicate the same (congruent) or opposite response (incongruent). Single- and dual-process flanker models were implemented in a diffusion-model framework and tested against data from experiments that manipulated response bias, speed/accuracy tradeoffs, attentional focus, and stimulus configuration. There was strong mimcry among the models, and each captured the main trends in the data for the standard conditions. However, when more complex conditions were used, a single-process spotlight model captured qualitative and quantitative patterns that the dual-process models could not. Since the single-process model provided the best balance of fit quality and parsimony, the results indicate that processing in the simple versions of the flanker task is better described by gradual rather than discrete narrowing of attention. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 238
页数:29
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   A PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED-PROCESSING APPROACH TO AUTOMATICITY [J].
COHEN, JD ;
SERVANSCHREIBER, D ;
MCCLELLAND, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 105 (02) :239-269
[2]   Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time [J].
Diederich, A ;
Busemeyer, JR .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 47 (03) :304-322
[3]   The overconstraint of response time models: Rethinking the scaling problem [J].
Donkin, Chris ;
Brown, Scott D. ;
Heathcote, Andrew .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2009, 16 (06) :1129-1135
[4]   MOVEMENT AND VISUAL-ATTENTION - THE SPOTLIGHT METAPHOR BREAKS DOWN [J].
DRIVER, J ;
BAYLIS, GC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1989, 15 (03) :448-456
[5]   EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :143-149
[6]   INFORMATION-PROCESSING IN VISUAL-SEARCH - CONTINUOUS-FLOW CONCEPTION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS [J].
ERIKSEN, CW ;
SCHULTZ, DW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1979, 25 (04) :249-263
[7]   VISUAL-ATTENTION WITHIN AND AROUND THE FIELD OF FOCAL ATTENTION - A ZOOM LENS MODEL [J].
ERIKSEN, CW ;
STJAMES, JD .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1986, 40 (04) :225-240
[8]   The overlap model: A model of letter position coding [J].
Gomez, Pablo ;
Ratcliff, Roger ;
Perea, Manuel .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 115 (03) :577-601
[9]   OPTIMIZING THE USE OF INFORMATION - STRATEGIC CONTROL OF ACTIVATION OF RESPONSES [J].
GRATTON, G ;
COLES, MGH ;
DONCHIN, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1992, 121 (04) :480-506
[10]   PRESTIMULUS AND POSTSTIMULUS ACTIVATION OF RESPONSE CHANNELS - A PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS [J].
GRATTON, G ;
COLES, MGH ;
SIREVAAG, EJ ;
ERIKSEN, CW ;
DONCHIN, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1988, 14 (03) :331-344