Casting a new light on the seismic risk assessment of stone masonry buildings located within historic centres

被引:7
作者
Maio, Rui [1 ]
Estevao, Joao M. C. [2 ]
Ferreira, Tiago M. [3 ]
Vicente, Romeu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, RISCO Aveiro Res Ctr Risks & Sustainabil Construc, Dept Civil Engn, Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Univ Algarve, Dept Civil Engn, Faro, Portugal
[3] Univ Minho, ISISE Inst Sci & Innovat BioSustainabil IB S, Dept Civil Engn, Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Seismic risk; Historic centres; Vulnerability index method; Macroelement model; 3D-Macro (R) software code; Pushover analyses; N2; method; Seismic performance-based assessment; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; FAIAL ISLAND; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.008
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In light of the new legal framework in force in Portugal, which defines the terms for reporting the seismic vulnerability assessment and the need for seismic strengthening of existing buildings, this paper aims at investigating the correlation between two well-known approaches for the seismic risk assessment of stone masonry buildings located within historic centres: the vulnerability index method and nonlinear static seismic analyses. The latter were carried out by using a new three-dimensional macroelement model to numerically represent the considered sample of prototype buildings, together with the application of the N2 Method. In this paper, the original purpose of the vulnerability index method, that of ranking the seismic vulnerability of existing urban cultural heritage (UCH) assets within the same building typology, was numerically validated. However, when reverting the use of the vulnerability index method by replacing the Macroseismic Intensity with a response spectrum, the results were not as interesting as envisaged, since the correlations between the vulnerability index and the main properties of the capacity curves derived from numerical models, presented, in general, a poor fitting. Finally, the possible causes for such poor fitting and future lines of investigation are discussed. Despite these results must be understood with due care and diligence, the authors believe that this exercise might encourage new investigations on this topic that could lead to the development of a new code-oriented methodology for the seismic risk assessment of UCH assets within historic centres.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 592
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, Scheda di esposizione e vulnerabilita e di rilevamento Danni di primo livello e secondo livello muratura e cemento armato
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, 19983 NP EN
  • [3] Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area
    Barbat, Alex H.
    Carreno, Martha L.
    Pujades, Lluis G.
    Lantada, Nieves
    Cardona, Omar D.
    Marulanda, Mabel C.
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2010, 6 (1-2) : 17 - 38
  • [4] Performance-based Seismic Risk Assessment of Urban Systems
    Basaglia, Alberto
    Aprile, Alessandra
    Spacone, Enrico
    Pilla, Francesco
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2018, 12 (7-8) : 1131 - 1149
  • [5] Benedetti D., 1984, L'industria della costruzioni, V18, P66
  • [6] Bernardini A, 2007, P 12 C IT NAT ASS EA
  • [7] CEN, 2010, 19981 CEN NP EN
  • [8] CEN, 2005, EC83 CEN
  • [9] CEN, 2004, EC81 CEN
  • [10] Comparative fragility methods for seismic assessment of masonry buildings located in Muccia (Italy)
    Chieffo, Nicola
    Clementi, Francesco
    Formisano, Antonio
    Lenci, Stefano
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2019, 25