Peer group reflection helps clinical teachers to critically reflect on their teaching

被引:22
作者
Boerboom, Tobias B. B. [1 ]
Jaarsma, Debbie
Dolmans, Diana H. J. M. [2 ]
Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. [3 ]
Mastenbroek, Nicole J. J. M.
Van Beukelen, Peter
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, NL-3508 TD Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Sch Hlth Profess Educ SHE, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Inst Med Educ, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; STUDENTS; FACULTY; EDUCATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; METAANALYSIS; PHYSICIANS; VALIDITY; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2011.610840
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Student evaluations can help clinical teachers to reflect on their teaching skills and find ways to improve their teaching. Studies have shown that the mere presentation of student evaluations is not a sufficient incentive for teachers to critically reflect on their teaching. Aim: We evaluated and compared the effectiveness of two feedback facilitation strategies that were identical except for a peer reflection meeting. Method: In this study, 54 clinical teachers were randomly assigned to two feedback strategies. In one strategy, a peer reflection was added as an additional step. All teachers completed a questionnaire evaluating the strategy that they had experienced. We analysed the reflection reports and the evaluation questionnaire. Results: Both strategies stimulated teachers to reflect on feedback and formulate alternative actions for their teaching practice. The teachers who had participated in the peer reflection meeting showed deeper critical reflection and more concrete plans to change their teaching. All feedback strategies were considered effective by the majority of the teachers. Conclusions: Strategies with student feedback and self-assessment stimulated reflection on teaching and helped clinical teachers to formulate plans for improvement. A peer reflection meeting seemed to enhance reflection quality. Further research should establish whether it can have lasting effects on teaching quality.
引用
收藏
页码:E615 / E623
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1991, ED REFLECTIVE PRACTI
  • [2] Arreola R., 2007, Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems (3rd), V3rd
  • [3] Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback
    Atwater, LE
    Waldman, DA
    Brett, JF
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 41 (02) : 193 - 208
  • [4] How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments
    Beckman, TJ
    Ghosh, AK
    Cook, DA
    Erwin, PJ
    Mandrekar, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (09) : 971 - 977
  • [5] Berk R.A., 2005, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, V17, P48
  • [6] Berk RonaldA., 2006, Thirteen strategies to measure college teaching
  • [7] Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating veterinary clinical teachers' supervisory skills during clinical rotations
    Boerboom, T. B. B.
    Dolmans, D. H. J. M.
    Jaarsma, A. D. C.
    Muijtjens, A. M. M.
    Van Beukelen, P.
    Scherpbier, A. J. J. A.
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2011, 33 (02) : e84 - e91
  • [8] Brown K.W., 1999, RES METHODS HUMAN DE, V2d
  • [9] Cashin W.E., 1999, Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions, P25
  • [10] Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center
    Copeland, HL
    Hewson, MG
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (02) : 161 - 166