Do GPs respond to postal questionnaire surveys? A comprehensive review of primary care literature

被引:57
作者
Creavin, Samuel T. [1 ,2 ]
Creavin, Alexandra L. [1 ,3 ]
Mallen, Christian D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Keele Univ, Arthrit Res UK Natl Primary Care Ctr, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[2] N Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay Hosp, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Weston Area Hlth Trust, Weston Gen Hosp, Weston Super Mare, N Somerset, England
关键词
General practice; postal questionnaires; response rates; RATES; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmr001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. To determine a contemporary estimate for the mean response rate to surveys of GPs published in primary care journals over the past decade. Method. Twenty-four primary care journals from January 2000 to summer 2009 were searched for postal surveys of GPs. A total of 2838 abstracts were screened, with 683 full-text articles being examined for eligibility and 355 citations included. Results. Three hundred and sixty-one surveys of GPs were identified. A total of 338 598 questionnaires were distributed during the study period, with 182 256 returned response rate 61% (95% confidence interval [CI] 59-63%). There was some evidence of an association between response rate and journal impact factor, with a statistically significant higher mean response rate for journals in the highest (mean 67%; 95% CI 64-70%) compared to journals in the lowest quartile of impact factor (mean 55%; 95% CI 51-59%). There was no evidence that mean response rate had increased in the period from 2000 to 2009. Conclusions. Postal questionnaires of GPs do not necessarily result in a low response rate. Response rates over the past decade appear relatively unchanged despite the greater evidence base for improving response and further work should explore reasons for this.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 467
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
    Altman, DG
    Schulz, KF
    Moher, D
    Egger, M
    Davidoff, F
    Elbourne, D
    Gotzsche, PC
    Lang, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) : 663 - 694
  • [2] Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals
    Asch, DA
    Jedrziewski, MK
    Christakis, NA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) : 1129 - 1136
  • [4] Cummings SM, 2001, HEALTH SERV RES, V35, P1347
  • [5] Edwards P, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4]
  • [6] Surveying physicians - Do components of the "Total Design Approach" to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians?
    Field, TS
    Cadoret, CA
    Brown, ML
    Ford, M
    Greene, SM
    Hill, D
    Hornbrook, MC
    Meenan, RT
    White, MJ
    Zapka, JM
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (07) : 596 - 605
  • [7] Grava-Gubins I, 2008, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V54, P1424
  • [8] A randomised clinical trial of subgrouping and targeted treatment for low back pain compared with best current care. The start back trial study protocol
    Hay, Elaine M.
    Dunn, Kate M.
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Lewis, Martyn
    Mason, Elizabeth E.
    Konstantinou, Kika
    Sowden, Gail
    Somerville, Simon
    Vohora, Kanchan
    Whitehurst, David
    Main, Chris J.
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [9] Physician response to surveys - A review of the literature
    Kellerman, SE
    Herold, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [10] The assessment of the prognosis of musculoskeletal conditions in older adults presenting to general practice: a research protocol
    Mallen, Christian D.
    Peat, George
    Thomas, Elaine
    Wathall, Simon
    Whitehurst, Tracy
    Clements, Charlotte
    Bailey, Joanne
    Gray, Jacqueline
    Croft, Peter R.
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2006, 7 (1)