Fluid dynamics of a pressurized fluidized bed: comparison between numerical solutions from two-fluid models and experimental results

被引:49
作者
Enwald, H [1 ]
Almstedt, AE [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Thermo & Fluid Dynam, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
fluidized bed; two-fluid model; granular flow theory; turbulence; validation;
D O I
10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00187-0
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A validation of four different two-fluid model closures was carried out to investigate the effect of gas-phase turbulence, drift velocity and three dimensionality on the fluid dynamics of a bubbling fluidized bed. At atmospheric conditions, it is verified that gas-phase turbulence has a negligible effect for the bed material and operating conditions used in the investigation, whereas the validation shows some evidence that the gas-phase turbulence has a significant contribution for higher pressures. The drift velocity shows no noticeable effect on the results at any pressure. A comparison between two- and three-dimensional calculations at atmospheric pressure shows that the three-dimensional effects appear to be considerable. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 342
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Almsedt A. E., 1985, P 8 INT C FLUID BED, P865
[2]  
ALMSTEDT AE, 1987, THESIS CHALMERS U TE
[3]  
BALZER G, 1995, FLUIDIZATION, V8, P1125
[4]  
BALZER G, 1996, 8 WORKSH 2 PHAS FLOW
[5]  
BOELLE A, 1997, HE4497004A EDF LAB N
[6]  
BOEMER A, 1995, ASME FBC C, V2, P775
[7]  
CHAPMAN S, 1970, CAMBRIDGE MATH THEOR
[8]  
CLIFT R, 1985, FLUIDIZATION, P77
[9]  
CSANADY GT, 1963, J ATMOS SCI, V20, P201, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0201:TDOHPI>2.0.CO
[10]  
2