A Method for Obtaining an Unbiased Sample of Family Medicine Patients for Research Purposes

被引:3
作者
Logue, Everett E. [1 ]
Bourguet, Claire C. [2 ]
机构
[1] NE Ohio Med Univ Akron, Summa Hlth Syst, Dept Family Med, Akron, OH 44309 USA
[2] NE Ohio Med Univ Akron, Dept Family & Community Med, Akron, OH 44309 USA
关键词
Health Services; Primary Health Care; Research Methods; Sampling Studies; Selection Bias; Survey Methods; Sampling Bias; PRIMARY-CARE; SETTINGS;
D O I
10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.100052
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Obtaining a representative patient sample for research purposes can be challenging. Classic probability sampling can be trusted, but these approaches are not always feasible; yet alternatives may introduce bias. We summarize relevant literature, the need for new approaches, and illustrate a practical hybrid approach that could consistently produce representative patient samples. Methods: Valid approaches shift sampling decisions from fallible interviewers to less fallible reproducible processes. In lieu of the interviewer's inclination to select particular patients, we used the day of the week, the appointment time, and the sequence of the patient's last name in the alphabet to select a sample for a consent process and a survey. Illustrative Use: Characteristics of the study sample (n = 225) were compared with the characteristics of the population (N = 1964) that had an office visit during the recruiting period. The data suggested that the study sample was highly representative of the population in this illustrative case. Discussion: A hybrid sampling approach, in the context of a brief consent process, and a nonthreatening interview produced a representative study sample, but formal evaluation via simulation is needed to validate the hybrid approach. Convenience samples of consecutive patients should be avoided to minimize bias. (J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:583-588.)
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 588
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Aday LA, 1996, DESIGNING CONDUCTING, P112
[2]   Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) :119-126
[3]   Describing primary care encounters: The Primary Care Network Survey and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey [J].
Bins, Helen J. ;
Lanier, David ;
Pace, Wilson D. ;
Galliher, James M. ;
Ganiats, Theodore G. ;
Grey, Margaret ;
Ariza, Adolfo J. ;
Williams, Robert .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2007, 5 (01) :39-47
[4]  
CUMMING RG, 1990, COMMUNITY HEALTH ST, V14, P132
[5]   Using probability vs. nonprobability sampling to identify hard-to-access participants for health-related research: Costs and contrasts [J].
Feild, Lucy ;
Pruchno, Rachel A. ;
Bewley, Jennifer ;
Lemay, Edward P., Jr. ;
Levinsky, Norman G. .
JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2006, 18 (04) :565-583
[6]  
Graubard B I, 1996, Stat Methods Med Res, V5, P263, DOI 10.1177/096228029600500304
[7]   What patient population does visit-based sampling in primary care settings represent? [J].
Lee, ML ;
Yano, EM ;
Wang, MM ;
Simon, BF ;
Rubenstein, LV .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (09) :761-770
[8]  
Levy PS., 1980, Sampling for health professionals
[9]  
Logue EE, 2010, OBESITY, V18, pS145
[10]  
Mainous A G 3rd, 1991, Fam Med, V23, P539