Can internalism be saved?

被引:1
作者
Kornblith, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Philosophy, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
Chisholm; Feldman; internalism; externalism; epistemic advice;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9973.2003.00297.x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Richard Feldman argues that a good deal more of Chisholm's approach can be saved than I allowed in "Roderick Chisholm and the Shaping of American Epistemology." More than this, Feldman argues that there are other, and still more defensible, forms of internalism. I argue here that the problems I presented for Chisholm's view are not so easily sidestepped either within Chisholm's system or by other forms of internalism.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 629
页数:9
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
AUDI R, 1997, PHILOS RM CHISHOLM, P323
[2]  
CONEE E, 2001, EPISTEMOLOGY INTERNA, P231
[3]   EVIDENTIALISM [J].
FELDMAN, R ;
CONEE, E .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1985, 48 (01) :15-34
[4]   INTROSPECTION AND MISDIRECTION [J].
KORNBLITH, H .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1989, 67 (04) :410-422
[5]  
Kornblith H., 2002, KNOWLEDGE ITS PLACE