Korean Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations: Updates in the Third Version

被引:13
作者
Bae, Eun-Young [1 ]
Hong, Jihyung [2 ]
Bae, SeungJin [3 ]
Hahn, Seokyung [4 ]
An, Hyonggin [5 ]
Hwang, Eun-joo [6 ]
Lee, Seung-min [6 ]
Lee, Tae-jin [7 ]
机构
[1] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Coll Pharm, Jinju Si, Gyeongnam, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Coll Social Sci, Dept Healthcare Management, Seongnam Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Pharm, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Hlth Insurance Review & Assessment Serv, Pharmaceut Benefit Listing Div, Wonju, Gangwon Do, South Korea
[7] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s40258-022-00721-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The first version of the pharmacoeconomic (PE) guidelines was published in South Korea in 2006. Despite its first revision in 2011, there were still ambiguities in its interpretation. Moreover, methodologies for estimating effectiveness and costs have also evolved since then. Under these circumstances, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service published the third version in January 2021. This article reviews the revision process and major changes made in the new edition of the PE guidelines. The revision was processed through reviews of the previous 50 PE submissions, international guidelines, academic literature, and surveys and advisory meetings to obtain stakeholders' opinions. The analysis perspective has changed from a limited societal perspective to a healthcare system perspective. In addition to the drug with the highest market share, drugs used in clinical trials can be selected as comparators under certain conditions. The discount rate decreased from 5% to 4.5%. Furthermore, the revised guidelines provide more detailed and specific instructions for items including non-inferiority margin, extrapolation, utility elicitation, and uncertainty. Treatment switch and co-dependent technology guidelines are newly included; the budget impact analysis guideline is deleted. Through this revision, transparency and consistency of decision-making is expected to improve.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 477
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Arrow K., 1999, Contemporary economic issues, P89, DOI [10.1007/978-1-349-14540-9, DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-14540-9, DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-14540-9_5]
  • [2] Australian Government: Department of Health, 2016, GUID PREP SUBM PHARM
  • [3] Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines and Their Implementation in the Positive List System in South Korea
    Bae, Eun Young
    Lee, Eui Kyung
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 : S36 - S41
  • [4] Sourcing Quality-of-Life Weights Obtained from Previous Studies: Theory and Reality in Korea
    Bae, SeungJin
    Bae, Eun Young
    Lim, Sang Hee
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (02) : 141 - 150
  • [5] Korean Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation (Second and Updated Version) Consensus and Compromise
    Bae, SeungJin
    Lee, SooOk
    Bae, Eun Young
    Jang, Sunmee
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (04) : 257 - 267
  • [6] 최지은, 2015, [Journal of Social Science, 사회과학연구], V41, P145
  • [7] Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, 2021, GUID EC EV PHARM
  • [8] HIRA, 2018, 2018 TF REP IMPR EC
  • [9] ISPOR, PHARM GUID WORLD
  • [10] KDI Public and Private Infrastructure Investment Management Center, 2018, REV GUID PREL FEAS S