Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:63
|
作者
de Waha, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
Jobs, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Eitel, Ingo [1 ,2 ]
Poess, Janine [1 ,2 ]
Stiermaier, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Meyer-Saraei, Roza [1 ,2 ]
Fuernau, Georg [1 ,2 ]
Zeymer, Uwe [3 ]
Desch, Steffen [1 ,2 ]
Thiele, Holger [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Univ Heart Ctr Luebeck, Dept Cardiol Angiol & Intens Care Med, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Partner Site Hamburg Kiel Luebeck, German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Lubeck, Germany
[3] Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Med Klin B, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[4] Univ Leipzig, Dept Internal Med Cardiol, Heart Ctr Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Multivessel coronary artery disease; acute myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock; reperfusion; percutaneous coronary intervention; REVASCULARIZATION; PCI; COUNTERPULSATION; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1177/2048872617719640
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Early revascularisation of the culprit lesion is the therapeutic cornerstone in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The optimal management of additional non-culprit lesions is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarise current evidence on the comparison of immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) or culprit lesion only PCI with possible staged revascularisation (C-PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Methods: Medical literature databases were screened to identify analyses comparing MV-PCI with C-PCI in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease. In absence of randomised trials, 10 cohort studies were included in the current meta-analysis. The primary outcome of short-term mortality was assessed at hospital discharge or 30 days after hospital admission. Secondary outcomes were long-term mortality as well as myocardial re-infarction, stroke, acute renal failure, and bleeding at short-term follow-up. Results: Of 6051 patients, 1194 (19.7%) received MV-PCI and 4857 (80.3%) C-PCI. Short-term mortality was 37.5% in patients undergoing MV-PCI compared with 28.8% in C-PCI patients (risk ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.41, p=0.001). Long-term mortality (p=0.77), myocardial re-infarction (p=0.77), stroke (p=0.12), acute renal failure (p=0.17) and bleeding (p=0.53) did not differ significantly between the two revascularisation groups. Conclusions: Results of this first meta-analysis on the interventional management of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease do not support MV-PCI over C-PCI. However, possible treatment selection bias in the individual studies must be taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 37
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Choi, Ki Hong
    Yang, Jeong Hoon
    Park, Taek Kyu
    Lee, Joo Myung
    Song, Young Bin
    Hahn, Joo-Yong
    Choi, Seung-Hyuk
    Ahn, Chul-Min
    Yu, Cheol Woong
    Park, Ik Hyun
    Jang, Woo Jin
    Kim, Hyun-Joong
    Bae, Jang-Whan
    Kwon, Sung Uk
    Lee, Hyun-Jong
    Lee, Wang Soo
    Jeong, Jin-Ok
    Park, Sang-Don
    Kang, Tae-Soo
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (10):
  • [22] Immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the ALKK-PCI registry
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Hochadel, Mathias
    Thiele, Holger
    Andresen, Dietrich
    Schuehlen, Helmut
    Brachmann, Johannes
    Elsaesser, Albrecht
    Gitt, Anselm
    Zahn, Ralf
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2015, 11 (03) : 280 - 285
  • [23] Meta-Analysis of Culprit-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Toklu, Bora
    Stone, Gregg W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 121 (05): : 529 - 536
  • [24] MULTIVESSEL VERSUS CULPRIT-ONLY PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIVESSEL DISEASE AND ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION COMPLICATED WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Claessen, Bimmer
    Vis, Marije M.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    Meuwissen, Martijn
    de Winter, Rob J.
    Tijssen, Jan G.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Henriques, Jose P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)
  • [25] Revascularization strategies in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rahman, Hammad
    Khan, Safi U.
    Lone, Ahmad N.
    Kaluski, Edo
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (06) : 647 - 654
  • [26] Culprit-only versus multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention among STEMI patients complicated by cardiogenic shock in real-world practice: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Meng-Jin
    Yang, Yue-Jin
    Jiang, Wen-Yang
    Xu, Jing
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (08) : 8628 - +
  • [27] Multivessel or Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Real-World Evidence in Support of CULPRIT-SHOCK
    DeJong, Colette
    Redberg, Rita F.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 180 (10) : 1280 - 1283
  • [28] Preventive versus Culprit Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Meta Analysis
    Song, Yeo-Jeong
    Jang, Jae-Sik
    Kim, Byeong-Woo
    Jin, Han-Young
    Seo, Jeong-Sook
    Yang, Tae-Hyun
    Kim, Dae-Kyeong
    Kim, Dong-Soo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (11) : B4 - B4
  • [29] Complete versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Franco, Ancy Jenil
    Krishna, Mrinal Murali
    Joseph, Meghna
    Ezenna, Chidubem
    Bakir, Zeynep Eylul
    Sudo, Renan Yuji Ura
    Wippel, Catherine Wegner
    Ismayl, Mahmoud
    Goldsweig, Andrew M.
    Uthirapathy, Ilayaraja
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2025, 70 : 1 - 9
  • [30] OUTCOMES OF CULPRIT VERSUS MULTIVESSEL INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PRESENTING WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION COMPLICATED BY CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Cavender, Matthew
    Houghtaling, Penny
    Lieber, Elizabeth
    Kiernan, Michael
    Maytin, Melanie
    Rassi, Andrew
    Whitlow, Patrick
    Menon, Venu
    Ellis, Stephen
    Shishehbor, Mehdi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E278 - E278