Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:63
|
作者
de Waha, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
Jobs, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Eitel, Ingo [1 ,2 ]
Poess, Janine [1 ,2 ]
Stiermaier, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Meyer-Saraei, Roza [1 ,2 ]
Fuernau, Georg [1 ,2 ]
Zeymer, Uwe [3 ]
Desch, Steffen [1 ,2 ]
Thiele, Holger [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Univ Heart Ctr Luebeck, Dept Cardiol Angiol & Intens Care Med, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Partner Site Hamburg Kiel Luebeck, German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Lubeck, Germany
[3] Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Med Klin B, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[4] Univ Leipzig, Dept Internal Med Cardiol, Heart Ctr Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Multivessel coronary artery disease; acute myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock; reperfusion; percutaneous coronary intervention; REVASCULARIZATION; PCI; COUNTERPULSATION; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1177/2048872617719640
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Early revascularisation of the culprit lesion is the therapeutic cornerstone in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The optimal management of additional non-culprit lesions is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarise current evidence on the comparison of immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) or culprit lesion only PCI with possible staged revascularisation (C-PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Methods: Medical literature databases were screened to identify analyses comparing MV-PCI with C-PCI in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease. In absence of randomised trials, 10 cohort studies were included in the current meta-analysis. The primary outcome of short-term mortality was assessed at hospital discharge or 30 days after hospital admission. Secondary outcomes were long-term mortality as well as myocardial re-infarction, stroke, acute renal failure, and bleeding at short-term follow-up. Results: Of 6051 patients, 1194 (19.7%) received MV-PCI and 4857 (80.3%) C-PCI. Short-term mortality was 37.5% in patients undergoing MV-PCI compared with 28.8% in C-PCI patients (risk ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.41, p=0.001). Long-term mortality (p=0.77), myocardial re-infarction (p=0.77), stroke (p=0.12), acute renal failure (p=0.17) and bleeding (p=0.53) did not differ significantly between the two revascularisation groups. Conclusions: Results of this first meta-analysis on the interventional management of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease do not support MV-PCI over C-PCI. However, possible treatment selection bias in the individual studies must be taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 37
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis
    De Waha, S.
    Jobs, A.
    Eitel, I.
    Poess, J.
    Stiermaier, T.
    Fuernau, G.
    Zeymer, U.
    Desch, S.
    Thiele, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 708 - 708
  • [2] Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khalid, Muhammad Faisal
    Khan, Abdul Ahad
    Khattak, Furqan
    Ayub, Muhammad Talha
    Bagai, Jayant
    Mukherjee, Debabrata
    Helton, Thomas
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Banerjee, Subhash
    Paul, Timir K.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (11) : 956 - 964
  • [3] CULPRIT ONLY VERSUS MULTIVESSEL PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A META-ANALYSIS OF OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES
    Kolte, Dhaval
    Sardar, Partha
    Khera, Sahil
    Aronow, Wilbert
    Owan, Theophilus
    Jain, Diwakar
    Panza, Julio
    Frishman, William
    Fonarow, Gregg
    Bhatt, Deepak
    Aronow, Herbert
    Abbott, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 102 - 102
  • [4] Multivessel Versus Culprit-Lesion-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Kundu, Amartya
    Sardar, Partha
    Kakouros, Nikolaos
    Kolte, Dhaval
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    Fisher, Daniel
    Feldman, Dmitriy
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : B271 - B271
  • [5] Meta-analysis Comparing Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Siddiqi, Tariq Jamal
    Usman, Muhammad Shariq
    Riaz, Haris
    Khan, Abdur Rahman
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Kalra, Ankur
    Figueredo, Vincent M.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 123 (02): : 218 - 226
  • [6] Culprit Vessel Only versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: A Comprehensive Updated Meta-Analysis
    Khalid, Muhammad
    Khan, Abdul
    Ayub, Muhammad
    Khattak, Furqan
    Murtaza, Ghulam
    Paul, Timir
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : B272 - B272
  • [7] Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Culprit Vessel Only Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
    Gill, Gauravpal S.
    Sanchez, Jorge Sanz
    Abusnina, Waiel
    Kanmanthareddy, Arun K.
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [8] Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis
    Kolte, Dhaval
    Sardar, Partha
    Khera, Sahil
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Thiele, Holger
    Hochadel, Matthias
    Radovanovic, Dragana
    Erne, Paul
    Hambraeus, Kristina
    James, Stefan
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Mylotte, Darren
    Garot, Philippe
    Aronow, Wilbert S.
    Owan, Theophilus
    Jain, Diwakar
    Panza, Julio A.
    Frishman, William H.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Aronow, Herbert D.
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (11)
  • [9] LONG-TERM MORTALITY WITH MULTIVESSEL VERSUS CULPRIT-LESION-ONLY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: INSIGHTS FROM AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS
    Kundu, Amartya
    Sardar, Partha
    Malhotra, Rohit
    Kakouros, Nikolaos
    Fisher, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 1190 - 1190
  • [10] Outcomes of multivessel vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Evidence from an updated meta-analysis
    Kundu, Amartya
    Sardar, Partha
    Kakouros, Nikolaos
    Malhotra, Rohit
    Kolte, Dhaval
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    Abbott, J. D.
    Fisher, Daniel Z.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 94 (01) : 70 - 81