Correlation of modified Gleason grading with pT stage of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Helpap, Burkhard [2 ]
Egevad, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Agcy Res Canc, World Hlth Org, Pathol Grp PAT, F-69372 Lyon 08, France
[2] Univ Freiburg, Acad Hosp, Gen Hosp HBH Klin Singen, Dept Pathol, Singen, Germany
来源
ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY | 2008年 / 30卷 / 01期
关键词
Gleason score; modified; prostate; adenocarcinoma; pT stage; radical prostatectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To study the correlation between modified Gleason score (GS) and pT stage of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Six hundred forty-nine consecutive RP specimens were graded according to the conventional and the modified Gleason grading systems. RESULTS: A total of 29% of the tumors were upgraded. Both variants of GS correlated with pathologic stage. Stage pT2 tumors were assigned a GS of 3-6 less often with modified grading than with conventional grading (29% and 84%, respectively). The only significant difference of stage distribution between conventional and modified GS was for GS 7, where pT2 was the most common stage with modified grading (54%) and pT3 was most common with conventional grading (67%). Of GS 3 + 4 = 7a tumors, 95% were stage pT2, while 79% of GS 4 + 3 = 7b tumors were stage pT3-4. CONCLUSION: The stage distribution of modified GSs of RP specimens differs from that of conventional GSs, but a good correlation exists between grade and pT stage. Notably, GS 4 + 3 = 7b was more often associated with high stage than was GS 3 + 4 7a.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Correlation of US features with prostatic fossa biopsy findings
    Leventis, AK
    Shariat, SF
    Slawin, KM
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (02) : 432 - 439
  • [32] Influence of Gleason score at the level of surgical margin on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Susperregui, J.
    Pierry, C.
    Bonhomme, B.
    Pasticier, G.
    Bernhard, J. -C.
    Capon, G.
    Bensadoun, H.
    Ballanger, P.
    Ferriere, J. -M.
    Robert, G.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2017, 27 (12): : 632 - 639
  • [33] Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 and Oncological Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy
    Hashine, Katsuyoshi
    Yuasa, Akihito
    Shinomori, Kensuke
    Shirato, Akitomi
    Ninomiya, Iku
    Teramoto, Norihiro
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 41 (04) : 571 - 576
  • [34] Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
    Milonas, Daimantas
    Grybas, Aivaras
    Auskalnis, Stasys
    Gudinaviciene, Inga
    Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas
    Kincius, Marius
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 205 - 208
  • [35] Prostatic carcinosarcoma seven years after radical prostatectomy and hormonal therapy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: A case report
    Huang, Xiao
    Cai, Song-Liang
    Xie, Li-Ping
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (22) : 6388 - 6392
  • [36] Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
    Satoru Taguchi
    Yukari Uemura
    Tetsuya Fujimura
    Teppei Morikawa
    Akihiro Naito
    Taketo Kawai
    Motofumi Suzuki
    Haruki Kume
    Hiroshi Fukuhara
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [37] A Tertiary Gleason Pattern in the Prostatectomy Specimen and its Association with Adverse Outcome after Radical Prostatectomy
    Adam, Meike
    Hannah, Amir
    Budaeus, Lars
    Steuber, Thomas
    Salomon, Georg
    Michl, Uwe
    Haese, Alexander
    Fisch, Margit
    Wittmer, Corinna
    Steurer, Stefan
    Minner, Sarah
    Heinzer, Hans
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Sauter, Guido
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01) : 97 - 101
  • [38] Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Uemura, Yukari
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Morikawa, Teppei
    Naito, Akihiro
    Kawai, Taketo
    Suzuki, Motofumi
    Kume, Haruki
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] Multiple metastases of prostatic adenocarcinoma to the urethra after radical prostatectomy
    Constantinides, Constantinos
    Haritopoulos, Konstantinos
    Anastasiou, Ioannis
    Dritsas, Charalambos
    Papamichael, Virginia
    Zervas, Anastasios
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2007, 79 (01) : 92 - 93
  • [40] Predictors of Gleason Grading Group Upgrading in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients From Transperineal Biopsy After Radical Prostatectomy
    Zhou, Ling
    Xu, Li-long
    Zheng, Lin-lin
    Chen, Chao
    Xu, Li
    Zeng, Ji-ling
    Li, Shi-yan
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) : 2838 - 2847