Correlation of modified Gleason grading with pT stage of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Helpap, Burkhard [2 ]
Egevad, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Agcy Res Canc, World Hlth Org, Pathol Grp PAT, F-69372 Lyon 08, France
[2] Univ Freiburg, Acad Hosp, Gen Hosp HBH Klin Singen, Dept Pathol, Singen, Germany
来源
ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY | 2008年 / 30卷 / 01期
关键词
Gleason score; modified; prostate; adenocarcinoma; pT stage; radical prostatectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To study the correlation between modified Gleason score (GS) and pT stage of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Six hundred forty-nine consecutive RP specimens were graded according to the conventional and the modified Gleason grading systems. RESULTS: A total of 29% of the tumors were upgraded. Both variants of GS correlated with pathologic stage. Stage pT2 tumors were assigned a GS of 3-6 less often with modified grading than with conventional grading (29% and 84%, respectively). The only significant difference of stage distribution between conventional and modified GS was for GS 7, where pT2 was the most common stage with modified grading (54%) and pT3 was most common with conventional grading (67%). Of GS 3 + 4 = 7a tumors, 95% were stage pT2, while 79% of GS 4 + 3 = 7b tumors were stage pT3-4. CONCLUSION: The stage distribution of modified GSs of RP specimens differs from that of conventional GSs, but a good correlation exists between grade and pT stage. Notably, GS 4 + 3 = 7b was more often associated with high stage than was GS 3 + 4 7a.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tertiary Gleason Patterns and Biochemical Recurrence After Prostatectomy: Proposal for a Modified Gleason Scoring System
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Guo, Charles C.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    Magheli, Ahmed
    Loeb, Stacy
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (04) : 1364 - 1370
  • [22] Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy gleason grade in academic and community settings
    Steinberg, DM
    Sauvageot, J
    Piantadosi, S
    Epstein, JI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1997, 21 (05) : 566 - 576
  • [23] Prostate Cancer Grading A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 140 (10) : 1140 - 1152
  • [24] Correlation of modified gleason grading of prostate carcinoma with age, serum prostate specific antigen and tumor extent in needle biopsy specimens
    Helpap, Burkhard
    Egevad, Lars
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 2008, 30 (03): : 133 - 138
  • [25] Is There a Concordance Between the Gleason Scores of Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Prostatic Carsinoma?
    Ozgor, Faruk
    Kucuktopcu, Onur
    Sahan, Murat
    Simsek, Abdulmuttalip
    Berberoglu, Ahmet Yalcin
    Sarilar, Omer
    Savun, Metin
    Gurbuz, Zafer Gokhan
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2016, 54 (01): : 32 - 35
  • [26] Gleason scores in prostate needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in prostatic adenocarcinoma: A correlation study
    Awang, Asmawiza
    Isa, Nurismah Md
    Yunus, Rosna
    Shah, Shamsul Azhar
    Pauzi, Suria Hayati Md
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2019, 41 (03) : 253 - 257
  • [27] The role of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia for biochemical relapse of prostate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy
    Auskalnis, Stasys
    Milonas, Daimantas
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    Vaiciunas, Kestutis
    Mickevicius, Antanas
    Gudinaviciene, Inga
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2010, 46 (09): : 604 - 610
  • [28] Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in patients with Gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Li, Jiakun
    Guo, Yaochuan
    Qiu, Shi
    He, Mingjing
    Jin, Kun
    Zheng, Xiaonan
    Tu, Xiang
    Liao, Xinyang
    Yang, Lu
    Wei, Qiang
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2019, 12 : 7157 - 7164
  • [29] Is the biopsy Gleason score important in predicting outcomes for patients after radical prostatectomy once the pathological Gleason score is known?
    Vira, Manish A.
    Guzzo, Thomas
    Heitjan, Daniel F.
    Tomaszewski, John E.
    D'Amico, Anthony
    Wein, Alan J.
    Malkowicz, S. Bruce
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (10) : 1232 - 1236
  • [30] Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
    Zhang, Baoling
    Wu, Shangrong
    Zhang, Yang
    Guo, Mingyu
    Liu, Ranlu
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21): : 7772 - 7780