Wire-guided intraductal US: an adjunct to ERCP in the management of bile duct stones

被引:49
作者
Das, A
Isenberg, G
Wong, RCK
Sivak, MV
Chak, A
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Div Gastroenterol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Wade Pk VA Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2001.115006
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) may misdiagnose bile duct stones if air bubbles are introduced during contrast injection, and it may also fail to diagnose stones in the presence of bile duct dilation. Methods: Our aim was to determine whether intraductal US (IDUS) improves the accuracy of cholangiography and whether it is a useful adjunct in the management of bile duct stones. IDUS with a wire-guided US probe was performed after initial ERC in patients in whom bile duct stones were suspected. The diagnostic accuracy of ERC alone was compared with that of ERC plus IDUS. Results: ERC with IDUS was performed in 62 patients who were suspected to have bile duct stones. Both IDUS and ERC were performed by the same endoscopist, and ERC was performed with a C-arm fluoroscope. The presence of bile duct stones and/or sludge were confirmed after sphincterotomy and extraction in 34 patients. Overall, the accuracy of ERC combined with IDUS in the diagnosis of bile duct stone and/or sludge was higher than that of ERC alone (97% vs. 87%, p < 0.05). With dilated bile ducts, the diagnostic accuracy of ERC combined with IDUS was also higher than that of ERC alone (95.5% vs, 72.7%, p < 0.05). Additional diagnostic information provided by II)US included identification of cystic duct stones in 5 patients, characterization of bile duct strictures in 2 patients, and choledochal varices in 1 patient. Performance of wire-guided IDUS required 5% of the total procedure time. Conclusions: IDUS improves diagnostic accuracy of ERC and is a useful adjunct to ERC when bile duct stones are suspected.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 36
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] AMOUYAL P, 1989, LANCET, V2, P1195
  • [2] DIAGNOSIS OF CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    AMOUYAL, P
    AMOUYAL, G
    LEVY, P
    TUZET, S
    PALAZZO, L
    VILGRAIN, V
    GAYET, B
    BELGHITI, J
    FEKETE, F
    BERNADES, P
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 106 (04) : 1062 - 1067
  • [3] Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis
    Canto, MIF
    Chak, A
    Stellato, T
    Sivak, MV
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (06) : 439 - 448
  • [4] Prospective evaluation of an over-the-wire catheter US probe
    Chak, A
    Isenberg, G
    Kobayashi, K
    Wong, RCK
    Sivak, MV
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (02) : 202 - 205
  • [5] Edmundowicz S A, 1995, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V5, P817
  • [6] Miniprobe ultrasonography in the upper gastrointestinal tract: State of the Art 1995, and prospects
    Menzel, J
    Domschke, W
    Brambs, HJ
    Frank, N
    Hatfield, A
    Nattermann, C
    Odegaard, S
    Seifert, H
    Tamada, K
    Tio, TL
    Foerster, EC
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 28 (06) : 508 - 513
  • [7] Assessment of residual bile duct stones with use of intraductal US during endoscopic balloon sphincteroplasty: comparison with balloon cholangiography
    Ohashi, A
    Ueno, N
    Tamada, K
    Tomiyama, T
    Wada, S
    Miyata, T
    Nishizono, T
    Tano, S
    Aizawa, T
    Ido, K
    Kimura, K
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (03) : 328 - 333
  • [8] Which test for common bile duct stones? Endoscopic and intraductal ultrasonography
    Palazzo, L
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 29 (07) : 655 - 665
  • [9] Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis
    Prat, F
    Amouyal, G
    Amouyal, P
    Pelletier, G
    Fritsch, J
    Choury, AD
    Buffet, C
    Etienne, JP
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 347 (8994) : 75 - 79
  • [10] DIAGNOSTIC ERCP
    SHIMIZU, S
    TADA, M
    KAWAI, K
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 26 (01) : 88 - 92