Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Intermittent Self-Catheterization Users: A Systematic Review

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Xue [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Xiaona [2 ]
Li, Jialin [1 ]
Deng, Cuiyu [1 ]
Wang, Ting [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Li [1 ]
Zhang, Qing [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ Second Hosp, Pingjiang Rd, Tianjin 300211, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2021年 / 102卷 / 11期
关键词
Intermittent urethral catheterization; Neurogenic bladder disor-ders; Psychometrics; Patient reported outcome measures; Rehabil-itation; Systematic review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; NEUROGENIC BLADDER; MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS; VALIDATION; HEALTH; COSMIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; MANAGEMENT; DIFFICULTIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.020
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) users, critically assess and summarize the quality of the measurement properties, and describe the application scenarios on each instrument. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and relevant reference lists were systematically searched through December 2019 (updated May 2020). Study Selection: Two reviewers independently identified original English language publications that evaluated the psychometric properties of specific PROMs used in ISC patients. Data Extraction: The following data were obtained: author and publication year, content of domains and subscales, number of items, response options, constructs measured, language, and information on measurement properties. Data Synthesis: Eleven publications were deemed eligible, including 6 PROMs for measuring patients' ISC-related quality of life, self-confidence, satisfaction, difficulties, acceptance, and adherence to treatment. The Intermittent Self-Catheterization Questionnaire provided the most detail, and the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test could be evaluated on the most consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instrument properties. Conclusions: Several tools are available for ISC users, but at present there is no comprehensive, concise, and robust instrument with good psychometric properties. Further research on psychometric properties is needed to verify the remaining properties of existing scales and to develop novel tools for clinicians, researchers, and patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2021;102:2239-46 (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2239 / 2246
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Ileoanal Pouch Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Warsop, Zakary Ismail
    Manzo, Carlo Alberto
    Yu, Natalie
    Yusuf, Bilal
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Celentano, Valerio
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2024, 18 (03) : 479 - 487
  • [32] A COSMIN systematic review of generic patient-reported outcome measures in Switzerland
    Elsener, Thanh
    Kerry, Matthew
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [33] The rheumatoid foot: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Walmsley, Steven
    Williams, Anita E.
    Ravey, Mike
    Graham, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2010, 3
  • [34] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Foot and Ankle Pathologies: A Systematic Review
    Belen Ortega-Avila, Ana
    Cervera-Garvi, Pablo
    Ramos-Petersen, Laura
    Chicharro-Luna, Esther
    Gijon-Nogueron, Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (02):
  • [35] Patient-reported outcome measures for adult chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and quality assessment
    Rudmik, Luke
    Hopkins, Claire
    Peters, Anju
    Smith, Timothy L.
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    Soler, Zachary M.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 136 (06) : 1532 - +
  • [36] Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Adult Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review
    Kang, Yichen
    Guan, Tingyu
    Chen, Xiao
    Zhang, Yuxia
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 2024 : 5166392
  • [37] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Wiering, Bianca
    de Boer, Dolf
    Delnoij, Diana
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [38] Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery: A systematic review
    Beighley, Adam
    Zhang, Allen
    Huang, Brendan
    Carr, Christopher
    Mathkour, Mansour
    Werner, Cassidy
    Scullen, Tyler
    Kilgore, Mitchell D.
    Maulucci, Christopher M.
    Dallapiazza, Robert F.
    Kalyvas, James
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2022, 13 (04) : 378 - 389
  • [39] Patient-reported outcome measures in amblyopia and strabismus: a systematic review
    Kumaran, Sheela E.
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Baker, Rod
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2018, 101 (04) : 460 - 484
  • [40] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty
    M. Barone
    A. Cogliandro
    N. Di Stefano
    V. Tambone
    P. Persichetti
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274 : 1807 - 1811