Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Intermittent Self-Catheterization Users: A Systematic Review

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Xue [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Xiaona [2 ]
Li, Jialin [1 ]
Deng, Cuiyu [1 ]
Wang, Ting [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Li [1 ]
Zhang, Qing [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ Second Hosp, Pingjiang Rd, Tianjin 300211, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2021年 / 102卷 / 11期
关键词
Intermittent urethral catheterization; Neurogenic bladder disor-ders; Psychometrics; Patient reported outcome measures; Rehabil-itation; Systematic review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; NEUROGENIC BLADDER; MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS; VALIDATION; HEALTH; COSMIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; MANAGEMENT; DIFFICULTIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.020
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) users, critically assess and summarize the quality of the measurement properties, and describe the application scenarios on each instrument. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and relevant reference lists were systematically searched through December 2019 (updated May 2020). Study Selection: Two reviewers independently identified original English language publications that evaluated the psychometric properties of specific PROMs used in ISC patients. Data Extraction: The following data were obtained: author and publication year, content of domains and subscales, number of items, response options, constructs measured, language, and information on measurement properties. Data Synthesis: Eleven publications were deemed eligible, including 6 PROMs for measuring patients' ISC-related quality of life, self-confidence, satisfaction, difficulties, acceptance, and adherence to treatment. The Intermittent Self-Catheterization Questionnaire provided the most detail, and the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test could be evaluated on the most consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instrument properties. Conclusions: Several tools are available for ISC users, but at present there is no comprehensive, concise, and robust instrument with good psychometric properties. Further research on psychometric properties is needed to verify the remaining properties of existing scales and to develop novel tools for clinicians, researchers, and patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2021;102:2239-46 (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2239 / 2246
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures in burn-specific tools: A systematic review
    Li, Calandra
    Solish, Max
    Rogers, Alan D.
    BURNS, 2024, 50 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [22] Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer
    McKigney, Niamh
    Houston, Fergus
    Ross, Ellen
    Velikova, Galina
    Brown, Julia
    Harji, Deena Pravin
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (7) : 3969 - 3986
  • [23] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hyperhidrosis: a systematic review
    Gabes, Michaela
    Knuettel, Helge
    Kann, Gesina
    Tischer, Christina
    Apfelbacher, Christian J.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (03) : 671 - 686
  • [24] Standardising the Assessment of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Localised Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review
    Ratti, Maria Monica
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Alleva, Eugenia
    Leardini, Luca
    Sisca, Elena Silvia
    Derevianko, Alexandra
    Furnari, Federica
    Ferracini, Serena Mazzoleni
    Beyer, Katharina
    Moss, Charlotte
    Pellegrino, Francesco
    Sorce, Gabriele
    Barletta, Francesco
    Scuderi, Simone
    Omar, Muhammad Imran
    MacLennan, Steven
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Zong, Jihong
    Sara, J. MacLennan
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Cornford, Philip
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    N'Dow, James
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 5 (02): : 153 - 163
  • [25] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pediatric Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal from International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM)
    Salame, Nicole
    Torres, Josefina
    Sandhu, Jeena
    Duffin, Kristina Callis
    Garg, Amit
    Gottlieb, Alice B.
    Latella, John
    Merola, Joseph F.
    Armstrong, April W.
    DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 234 (3-4) : 112 - 119
  • [26] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Janic, Ana
    Bowden, Sylvie
    Levy, Sarah
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Dimaras, Helen
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [27] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pruritus: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Schoch, Dominic
    Sommer, Rachel
    Augustin, Matthias
    Staender, Sonja
    Blome, Christine
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 137 (10) : 2069 - 2077
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties
    Lee, Jiyeon
    Lee, Eun-Hyun
    Chae, Duckhee
    Kim, Chun-Ja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 105
  • [29] Patient-reported outcome measures in congenital heart surgery: a systematic review
    Francis, Jeevan
    Prothasis, Sneha
    George, Joseph
    Stoica, Serban
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2023, 33 (03) : 337 - 341
  • [30] Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
    Fan, Yanpin
    Shu, Xin
    Leung, Katherine Chiu Man
    Lo, Edward Chin Man
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)