Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Intermittent Self-Catheterization Users: A Systematic Review

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Xue [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Xiaona [2 ]
Li, Jialin [1 ]
Deng, Cuiyu [1 ]
Wang, Ting [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Li [1 ]
Zhang, Qing [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ Second Hosp, Pingjiang Rd, Tianjin 300211, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2021年 / 102卷 / 11期
关键词
Intermittent urethral catheterization; Neurogenic bladder disor-ders; Psychometrics; Patient reported outcome measures; Rehabil-itation; Systematic review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; NEUROGENIC BLADDER; MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS; VALIDATION; HEALTH; COSMIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; MANAGEMENT; DIFFICULTIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.020
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) users, critically assess and summarize the quality of the measurement properties, and describe the application scenarios on each instrument. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and relevant reference lists were systematically searched through December 2019 (updated May 2020). Study Selection: Two reviewers independently identified original English language publications that evaluated the psychometric properties of specific PROMs used in ISC patients. Data Extraction: The following data were obtained: author and publication year, content of domains and subscales, number of items, response options, constructs measured, language, and information on measurement properties. Data Synthesis: Eleven publications were deemed eligible, including 6 PROMs for measuring patients' ISC-related quality of life, self-confidence, satisfaction, difficulties, acceptance, and adherence to treatment. The Intermittent Self-Catheterization Questionnaire provided the most detail, and the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test could be evaluated on the most consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instrument properties. Conclusions: Several tools are available for ISC users, but at present there is no comprehensive, concise, and robust instrument with good psychometric properties. Further research on psychometric properties is needed to verify the remaining properties of existing scales and to develop novel tools for clinicians, researchers, and patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2021;102:2239-46 (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2239 / 2246
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Mohs Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Garg, Neha
    Mandloi, Shreya
    Queenan, Natalia
    Trivedi, Jay
    Mccann, Adam
    Xu, Vivian
    Amin, Dev
    Krein, Howard
    Heffelfinger, Ryan
    OTO OPEN, 2024, 8 (04)
  • [2] Patient-reported outcome measures in subarachnoid hemorrhage A systematic review
    Nobels-Janssen, Edith
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Verhagen, Wim I. M.
    Westert, Gert P.
    Bartels, Ronald H. M. A.
    Boogaarts, Jeroen D.
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (23) : 1096 - 1112
  • [3] Evaluation of Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Rhinoplasty A Systematic Review
    van Zijl, Floris V. W. J.
    Mokkink, L. B.
    Haagsma, J. A.
    Datema, Frank R.
    JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 21 (02) : 152 - 162
  • [4] A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures used in gout: an evaluation of their content and measurement properties
    Janssen, Carly A.
    Voshaar, Martijn A. H. Oude
    ten Klooster, Peter M.
    Jansen, Tim L. Th. A.
    Vonkeman, Harald E.
    van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [5] Patient-reported outcome measures in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review of psychometric properties
    Poku, Edith
    Duncan, Rosie
    Keetharuth, Anju
    Essat, Munira
    Phillips, Patrick
    Woods, Helen Buckley
    Palfreyman, Simon
    Jones, Georgina
    Kaltenthaler, Eva
    Michaels, Jonathan
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2016, 14
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review
    Pattinson, Rachael L.
    Trialonis-Suthakharan, Nirohshah
    Gupta, Sunnia
    Henry, Alasdair L.
    Lavallee, Jacqueline F.
    Otten, Marina
    Pickles, Timothy
    Courtier, Nick
    Austin, Jennifer
    Janus, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Bundy, Chris
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [7] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [8] Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Salivary Function: A Systematic Review
    Gulati, Arushi
    Kidane, Joseph
    Chang, Jolie L.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2023, 133 (08) : 1796 - 1805
  • [9] Quality of patient-reported outcome measures for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review
    Piontek, Katharina
    Gabes, Michaela
    Kann, Gesina
    Fechtner, Marie
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [10] Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review
    Wee, Priscilla Jia Ling
    Kwan, Yu Heng
    Loh, Dionne Hui Fang
    Phang, Jie Kie
    Puar, Troy H.
    Ostbye, Truls
    Thumboo, Julian
    Yoon, Sungwon
    Low, Lian Leng
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (08)