MRI grading for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness

被引:30
作者
Boschheidgen, M. [1 ]
Schimmoeller, L. [1 ]
Arsov, C. [2 ]
Ziayee, F. [1 ]
Morawitz, J. [1 ]
Valentin, B. [1 ]
Radke, K. L. [1 ]
Giessing, M. [2 ]
Esposito, I [3 ]
Albers, P. [2 ]
Antoch, G. [1 ]
Ullrich, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Urol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Pathol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Neoplasm grading; Magnetic resonance imaging; interventional; MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-08332-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives T o evaluate the value of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the prediction of prostate cancer (PCA) aggressiveness. Methods In this single center cohort study, consecutive patients with histologically confirmed PCA were retrospectively enrolled. Four different ISUP grade groups (1, 2, 3, 4-5) were defined and fifty patients per group were included. Several clinical (age, PSA, PSAD, percentage of PCA infiltration) and mpMRI parameters (ADC value, signal increase on high b-value images, diameter, extraprostatic extension [EPE], cross-zonal growth) were evaluated and correlated within the four groups. Based on combined descriptors, MRI grading groups (mG1-mG3) were defined to predict PCA aggressiveness. Results In total, 200 patients (mean age 68 years, median PSA value 8.1 ng/ml) were analyzed. Between the four groups, statistically significant differences could be shown for age, PSA, PSAD, and for MRI parameters cross-zonal growth, high b-value signal increase, EPE, and ADC (p < 0.01). All examined parameters revealed a significant correlation with the histopathologic biopsy ISUP grade groups (p < 0.01), except PCA diameter (p = 0.09). A mixed linear model demonstrated the strongest prediction of the respective ISUP grade group for the MRI grading system (p < 0.01) compared to single parameters. Conclusions MpMRI yields relevant pre-biopsy information about PCA aggressiveness. A combination of quantitative and qualitative parameters (MRI grading groups) provided the best prediction of the biopsy ISUP grade group and may improve clinical pathway and treatment planning, adding useful information beyond PI-RADS assessment category. Due to the high prevalence of higher grade PCA in patients within mG3, an early re-biopsy seems indicated in cases of negative or post-biopsy low-grade PCA.
引用
收藏
页码:2351 / 2359
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer [J].
Nowak, Johannes ;
Malzahn, Uwe ;
Baur, Alexander D. J. ;
Reichelt, Uta ;
Franiel, Tobias ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Durmus, Tahir .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (01) :107-114
[22]   Extraprostatic Tumor Extension: Comparison of Preoperative Multiparametric MRI Criteria and Histopathologic Correlation after Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Park, Kye Jin ;
Kim, Mi-hyun ;
Kim, Jeong Kon .
RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (01) :87-95
[23]   Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium [J].
Partin, AW ;
Mangold, LA ;
Lamm, DM ;
Walsh, PC ;
Epstein, JI ;
Pearson, JD .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) :843-848
[24]   Postoperative complications of contemporary open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using standardised reporting systems [J].
Pompe, Raisa S. ;
Beyer, Burkhard ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Preisser, Felix ;
Michl, Uwe ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Tilki, Derya .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (05) :801-807
[25]   Preoperative nomograms incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer [J].
Shukla-Dave, Amita ;
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Akin, Oguz ;
Yu, Changhong ;
Zakian, Kristen L. ;
Udo, Kazuma ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Eastham, James ;
Kattan, Michael W. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (09) :1315-1322
[26]   Comparison of T2-Weighted Imaging, DWI, and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Calculation of Prostate Cancer Index Lesion Volume: Correlation With Whole-Mount Pathology [J].
Sun, Chongpeng ;
Chatterjee, Aritrick ;
Yousuf, Ambereen ;
Antic, Tatjana ;
Eggener, Scott ;
Karczmar, Gregory S. ;
Oto, Aytekin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (02) :351-356
[27]   Prostate Cancer: Can Multiparametric MR Imaging Help Identify Patients Who Are Candidates for Active Surveillance? [J].
Turkbey, Baris ;
Mani, Haresh ;
Aras, Omer ;
Ho, Jennifer ;
Hoang, Anthony ;
Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. ;
Agarwal, Harsh ;
Shah, Vijay ;
Bernardo, Marcelino ;
Pang, Yuxi ;
Daar, Dagane ;
McKinney, Yolanda L. ;
Linehan, W. Marston ;
Kaushal, Aradhana ;
Merino, Maria J. ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (01) :144-152
[28]   Is Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Associated with Clinical Risk Scores for Prostate Cancers that Are Visible on 3-T MR Images ? [J].
Turkbey, Baris ;
Shah, Vijay P. ;
Pang, Yuxi ;
Bernardo, Marcelino ;
Xu, Sheng ;
Kruecker, Jochen ;
Locklin, Julia ;
Baccala, Angelo A., Jr. ;
Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. ;
Merino, Maria J. ;
Shih, Joanna H. ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 258 (02) :488-495
[29]   Prostate Cancer: Value of Multiparametric MR Imaging at 3 T for Detection-Histopathologic Correlation [J].
Turkbey, Baris ;
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Mani, Haresh ;
Bernardo, Marcelino ;
Pang, Yuxi ;
McKinney, Yolanda L. ;
Khurana, Kiranpreet ;
Ravizzini, Gregory C. ;
Albert, Paul S. ;
Merino, Maria J. ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 255 (01) :89-99
[30]   Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can exclude prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Ullrich, T. ;
Arsov, C. ;
Quentin, M. ;
Mones, F. ;
Westphalen, A. C. ;
Mally, D. ;
Hiester, A. ;
Albers, P. ;
Antoch, G. ;
Schimmoeller, L. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (11) :6042-6051