Lower Limb Revascularization for PAD Using a Heparin-Coated PTFE Conduit

被引:8
作者
Kirkwood, Melissa L. [1 ]
Wang, Grace J. [1 ]
Jackson, Benjamin M. [1 ]
Golden, Michael A. [1 ]
Fairman, Ronald M. [1 ]
Woo, Edward Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Div Vasc Surg & Endovasc Therapy, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
heparin bonded ePTFE; lower extremity bypass; PROPATEN; EXPANDED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE GRAFTS; MUSCLE CELL-PROLIFERATION; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; VASCULAR GRAFT; FEMOROPOPLITEAL BYPASS; INFRAGENICULAR BYPASS; EPTFE GRAFTS; NEOINTIMAL HYPERPLASIA; PLATELET DEPOSITION; BONDED DACRON;
D O I
10.1177/1538574411401757
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the patency of the PROPATEN Graft in lower extremity bypasses. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all lower extremity bypasses with the PROPATEN Graft from 2007-2009 at a single institution. There were 68 implants-56% male; mean age 69. Comorbidities included hypertension (HTN; 81%), hyperlipidemia (72%), coronary artery disease (CAD; 74%), and smoking (59%). Most patients were Rutherford category 4 or higher. A total of 34% of patients had only 1 runoff vessel; 10% of patients required a complex concomitant procedure with sequential extremity revascularization. Statistics were via Kaplan Meier. Results: Mean follow-up was 10.4 +/- 8.0 months (0-30). Patency was excellent in all positions. Primary patency for all patients was 94.0% and 86.0% at 30 days and 18 months, respectively. Limb salvage at 30 days was 95%, and at 18 months was 90%. No patients developed HIT. Ten patients lost graft patency. These patients had severe Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), with rest pain or tissue loss, poor runoff (no runoff or single vessel runoff), compromised inflow, and restored competitive flow. Fifty percent of the failed grafts were in the infrapopliteal position. Endovascular intervention and graft thrombectomy to restore patency was attempted in 2 patients and was unsuccessful. Conclusion: The GORE PROPATEN Vascular Graft demonstrates excellent patency in all arterial positions and may be the conduit of choice for all prosthetic bypasses.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 334
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] al-Lamee K, 1998, Med Device Technol, V9, P24
  • [2] ANDERSON AB, 1998, MED PLAS BIOMATERIAL, V5, P18
  • [3] Battaglia G, 2006, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V47, P41
  • [4] Improvements in GORE-TEX® Vascular Graft performance by Carmeda® BioActive Surface heparin immobilization
    Begovac, PC
    Thomson, RC
    Fisher, JL
    Hughson, A
    Gällhagen, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 25 (05) : 432 - 437
  • [5] Heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular graft for femoropopliteal and femorocrural bypass grafting:: 1-year results
    Bosiers, M
    Deloose, K
    Verbist, J
    Schroë, H
    Lauwers, G
    Lansink, W
    Peeters, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 43 (02) : 313 - 318
  • [6] INSITU SAPHENOUS-VEIN BYPASS GRAFTS FOR LIMB SALVAGE - A CURRENT FAD OR A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE TO REVERSED VEIN BYPASS GRAFTS
    BUSH, HL
    NABSETH, DC
    CURL, GR
    OHARA, ET
    JOHNSON, WC
    VOLLMAN, RW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 149 (04) : 477 - 480
  • [7] SUPPRESSION BY HEPARIN OF SMOOTH-MUSCLE CELL-PROLIFERATION IN INJURED ARTERIES
    CLOWES, AW
    KARNOWSKY, MJ
    [J]. NATURE, 1977, 265 (5595) : 625 - 626
  • [8] Heparin-bonded ePTFE grafts compared with vein grafts in femoropopliteal and femorocrural bypasses: 1-and 2-year results
    Daenens, Kim
    Schepers, Stijn
    Fourneau, Inge
    Houthoofd, Sabrina
    Nevelsteen, Andre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 49 (05) : 1210 - 1216
  • [9] Heparin-bonded Dacron or polytetrafluorethylene for femoropopliteal bypass: Five-year results of a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial
    Devine, C
    McCollum, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 40 (05) : 924 - 931
  • [10] Heparin-bonded Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene for femoropopliteal bypass grafting: A multicenter trial
    Devine, C
    McCollum, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (03) : 533 - 539