Predicting Clinical Gains and Side Effects of Stimulant Medication in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder by Combining Measures From qEEG and ERPs in a Cued GO/NOGO Task

被引:17
作者
Ogrim, Geir [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kropotov, Juri D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ostfold Hosp Trust, Neuropsychiat Unit, 127 Ilaveien, N-1605 Fredrikstad, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Psychol, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Gillberg Neuropsychiat Ctr, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Russian Acad Sci, P Bechtereva Inst Human Brain, St Petersburg, Russia
[5] Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow Univ, Dept Neuropsychol, Krakow, Poland
关键词
ADHD; stimulants; predictions; ERPs; qEEG; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS; METHYLPHENIDATE; CHILDREN; PERFORMANCE; ARTIFACTS; SYSTEM; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1177/1550059418782328
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. The study aim was to develop 2 scales: predicting clinical gains and risk of acute side effects of stimulant medication in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), combining measures from EEG spectra, event-related potentials (ERPs), and a cued visual GO/NOGO task. Methods. Based on 4-week systematic medication trials, 87 ADHD patients aged 8 to 17 years were classified as responders (REs, n = 62) or non-REs (n = 25), and belonging to the side effects (SEs, n = 42) or no-SEs (n = 45) groups. Before starting the trial, a 19-channel EEG was registered twice: Test 1 (T1) without medication and T2 on a single dose of stimulant medication a few days before the trial. EEG was registered T1 and T2: 3 minutes eyes-closed, 3 minutes eyes-open, and 20 minutes cued GO/NOGO. EEG spectra, ERPs, omissions, commissions, reaction time (RT), and RT variability were computed. Groups were compared at T1 and T2 on quantitative EEG (qEEG), ERPs and behavioral parameters; effect sizes (d) were estimated. Variables with d > 0.5 were converted to quartiles, multiplied by corresponding d, and summed to obtain 2 global scales. Results. Six variables differed significantly between REs and non-REs (T1: theta/alpha ratio, P3NOGO amplitude. Differences T2-T1: Omissions, RT variability, P3NOGO, contingent negative variation [CNV]). The global scale d was 1.86. Accuracy (receiver operating characteristic) was 0.92. SEs and no-SEs differed significantly on 4 variables. (T1: RT, T2: novelty component and alpha peak frequency, and RT changes. Global scale d = 1.08 and accuracy = 0.78. Conclusion. Gains and side effects of stimulants in pediatric ADHD can be predicted with high accuracy by combining EEG spectra, ERPs, and behavior from baseline and single-dose tests. identifier: NCT02695355.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Achenbach TM, 2001, MULTICULTURAL MANU S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, VFourth
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, BRIEF BEHAV RATING I
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, APP DIAG TREAT, DOI DOI 10.1016/C2012-0-07144-X
[5]  
Arns Martijn, 2008, Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, V7, P421, DOI 10.1142/S0219635208001897
[6]   Toward a New Understanding of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Pathophysiology An Important Role for Prefrontal Cortex Dysfunction [J].
Arnsten, Amy F. T. .
CNS DRUGS, 2009, 23 :33-41
[7]   Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders -: A systematic review and European treatment guideline [J].
Banaschewski, Tobias ;
Coghill, David ;
Santosh, Paramala ;
Zuddas, Alessandro ;
Asherson, Philip ;
Buitelaar, Jan ;
Danckaerts, Marina ;
Doepfner, Manfred ;
Faraone, Stephen V. ;
Rothenberger, Aribert ;
Sergeant, Joseph ;
Steinhausen, Hans-Christoph ;
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J. S. ;
Taylor, Eric .
EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 15 (08) :476-495
[8]  
Barkley R.A., 2006, Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment, V3
[9]  
BARKLEY RA, 1991, PEDIATRICS, V87, P519
[10]   Performance on a neurocognitive measure of alerting differentiates ADHD combined and inattentive subtypes: A preliminary report [J].
Booth, Jane E. ;
Carlson, Caryn L. ;
Tucker, David M. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 22 (04) :423-432