Arnason and Castoriadis' unfinished dialogue: Articulating the world

被引:2
作者
Adams, Suzi [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Dept Sociol, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
Arnason; Castoriadis; chora; culture; hermeneutics; phenomenology; the sacred; world orders;
D O I
10.1177/1368431010394510
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The article reconstructs the unfinished dialogue between Arnason and Castoriadis, with a particular emphasis on the problematic of world articulation. Arnason's thought is situated as reconfiguring classical sociological constellations, especially as they pertain to the revitalization of the civilizational problematic and the emphasis on the philosophical dimension of sociological investigation. His interpretative framework is located within the nascent field of post-transcendental phenomenology, which he elaborates via the overlapping problematics of cultural articulations of the world as an intercultural horizon, and the human condition as various modes of being-in-the-world. Arnason's encounter with Castoriadis is considered. Despite the many points of fruitful contact, Castoriadis' neglect of the phenomenological question of the world as a 'shared horizon' is, in Arnason's view, too great to overcome; Arnason looks instead to Weber, Merleau-Ponty and, more recently, Patocka for interpretative resources. Although Castoriadis' elucidation of the world proceeds 'in fragments', the article contends that hermeneutical reconstruction of his thought reveals openings onto the problematic of elemental world orders that can further the dialogue with Arnason.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 88
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ADAMS S, 2009, CHIASMI INT TRILINGU
[2]  
Adams S, 2008, TIJDSCHR FILOS, V70, P269
[3]  
Adams S, 2008, COSM HIST, V4, P387
[4]  
AMBROSE C, 2004, THESIS LA TROBE U ME
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, GREEK CITY HOMER ALE
[6]  
[Anonymous], ZWISCHENBETRACHTUNGE
[7]  
[Anonymous], THESIS 11
[8]  
[Anonymous], VARIETIES WORLDMAKIN
[9]  
[Anonymous], REV EUROPEENNE SCI S
[10]  
Arnason J., 2003, Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions