Verb Semantics Affects the Interpretation of Spatial Prepositions

被引:1
作者
Vorwerg, Constanze [1 ]
Weiss, Petra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Ctr Study Language & Soc, CH-3000 Bern 9, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
spatial cognition; frame of reference; deictic; intrinsic; direction; directional relations; projective prepositions; German; motion; temporal dimension; situation model; DIMENSIONAL PREPOSITIONS; LANGUAGE; COMPREHENSION; TIME;
D O I
10.1080/13875861003663770
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Spatial prepositions, more specifically projective prepositions, such as in front of or behind can be interpreted in different ways. Their interpretation depends on the spatial perspective taken as the basis for determining the reference frame's orientation. In 3 series of placement experiments with German speakers, we examined whether the interpretation of projective prepositions in a motion context is affected by the verb used in a spatial instruction. Results suggest that verb semantics is a factor accounting for previously observed seemingly social-situational differences in the interpretation of projective prepositions. Specifically, the findings indicate that, relative to a car as reference object, the semantic aspect of motion interruption associated with some verbs leads to a higher proportion of deictic interpretations determined by the direction from which one is approaching the car. This verb effect on the interpretation of spatial prepositions can be explained by an activation of the temporal dimension through stop-implying verbs, which is integrated into the spatial situation model of the perceived dynamic scene making the deictic frame of reference more compatible. The experimental evidence also shows that verb semantics can account for previously unexplained cross-linguistic differences, and is related to patterns concerning the prepositional inventory of languages.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 291
页数:45
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Verb Production in Aphasia: Testing the Division of Labor between Syntax and Semantics
    Thorne, Julia
    Faroqi-Shah, Yasmeen
    SEMINARS IN SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2016, 37 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [22] Spatial semantics: Recent advances
    Chechuro, Ilya Yu
    Yakovleva, Anastasia, V
    VOPROSY YAZYKOZNANIYA, 2019, (03): : 125 - 142
  • [23] Younger and Older Adults' Use of Verb Aspect and World Knowledge in the Online Interpretation of Discourse
    Mozuraitis, Mindaugas
    Chambers, Craig G.
    Daneman, Meredyth
    DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2013, 50 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [24] Metaphor interpretation and use: A window into semantics in schizophrenia
    Elvevag, B.
    Helsen, K.
    De Hert, M.
    Sweers, K.
    Storms, G.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2011, 133 (1-3) : 205 - 211
  • [25] How do Antecedent Semantics Influence Pronoun Interpretation? Evidence from Eye Movements
    Simovic, Tiana V.
    Chambers, Craig G.
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2023, 47 (02)
  • [26] The combined effects of a higher-level verb distribution and verb semantics on second language learners' restriction of L2 construction generalization
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2024, 62 (04): : 2121 - 2147
  • [27] Spatial Semantics: Tafereel, Einder and El Lissitzky
    Koenderink, Jan
    van Doorn, Andrea
    ART & PERCEPTION, 2024, 12 (02) : 93 - 143
  • [28] Cognitive focus affects spatial decisions under conditions of uncertainty
    Tenbrink, Thora
    Taylor, Holly A.
    Brunye, Tad T.
    Gagnon, Stephanie A.
    Gardony, Aaron L.
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2020, 21 (02) : 287 - 302
  • [29] Verb transitivity bias affects on-line sentence reading in people with aphasia
    DeDe, Gayle
    APHASIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (03) : 326 - 343
  • [30] Spatial (Mis-)Interpretation of Pointing Gestures to Distal Referents
    Herbort, Oliver
    Kunde, Wilfried
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2016, 42 (01) : 78 - 89