Action Change Theory: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective on Behavior Change

被引:31
作者
Vlaev, Ivo [1 ]
Dolan, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] London Sch Econ, Dept Social Policy, London, England
关键词
behavior change; motivation; decision neuroscience; behavioral economics; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PUBLIC-HEALTH; SELF-CONTROL; IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MULTIPLE PROCESSES; EXERCISE BEHAVIOR; RISK INFORMATION; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1037/gpr0000029
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Traditional theories of behavior change rely mostly on influencing higher-order mental processes as a route to altering deliberate responses, whereas more recent theorizing postulates that interventions can also rely on using contextual cues influencing lower-order processes as a route to changing spontaneous responses. We propose an alternative mechanistic account based on reinforcement learning theory, which utilizes different action control systems in the brain. Therefore, this account works at a different level of analysis and description, which promises to lead to the development of a more general and integrative theory of behavior change. Reward systems generate specific affective states that influence behavior via 3 action controllers. Innate actions are stereotyped evolutionarily determined responses to stimuli. Habitual actions develop through stimulus-response learning without explicit outcome representations. Goal-directed actions are based on an explicit model of the structure of the environment, which utilizes computations of action-outcome contingencies. We describe how these mechanisms for action control parsimoniously explain behavior change theories and techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 95
页数:27
相关论文
共 269 条
  • [81] Dayan P, 2012, NEUROSCIENCE OF PREFERENCE AND CHOICE: COGNITIVE AND NEURAL MECHANISMS, P33, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-381431-9.00002-4
  • [82] Dayan P, 2009, NEUROECONOMICS: DECISION MAKING AND THE BRAIN, P175, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-374176-9.00012-9
  • [83] Goal-directed control and its antipodes
    Dayan, Peter
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 2009, 22 (03) : 213 - 219
  • [84] Dayan Peter, 2001, Theoretical neuroscience: Computational and mathematical modeling of neuralsystems
  • [85] Reinforcement learning: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
    Dayana, Peter
    Niv, Yael
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) : 185 - 196
  • [86] Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain
    De Martino, Benedetto
    Kumaran, Dharshan
    Seymour, Ben
    Dolan, Raymond J.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5787) : 684 - 687
  • [87] Corticostriatal Connectivity Underlies Individual Differences in the Balance between Habitual and Goal-Directed Action Control
    de Wit, Sanne
    Watson, Poppy
    Harsay, Helga A.
    Cohen, Michael X.
    van de Vijver, Irene
    Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 32 (35) : 12066 - 12075
  • [88] Regulating the expectation of reward via cognitive strategies
    Delgado, Mauricio R.
    Gillis, M. Meredith
    Phelps, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 11 (08) : 880 - 881
  • [89] Dickinson A., 2002, STEVENS HDB EXPT PSY, P497, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471214426.PAS0312
  • [90] On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect
    Dijksterhuis, A
    Bos, MW
    Nordgren, LF
    van Baaren, RB
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 311 (5763) : 1005 - 1007