Dedicated breast PET value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions

被引:6
作者
Grana-Lopez, L. [1 ]
Herranz, M. [2 ,3 ]
Dominguez-Prado, I [2 ,3 ]
Argibay, S. [2 ,3 ]
Villares, A. [1 ]
Ruibal, A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Vazquez-Caruncho, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Lucus Augusti Lugo, Radiol Dept, Ulises Romero 1, Lugo 27003, Spain
[2] CHUS, IDIS, Nucl Med Dept, Travesia Choupana S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15706, Spain
[3] CHUS, IDIS, Mol Imaging Grp, Travesia Choupana S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15706, Spain
[4] USC, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Mol Imaging Grp, Campus Vida, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Breast; Molecular imaging; Dedicated breast PET; BI-RADS; 4; FDG PET; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; US; RECOMMENDATIONS; VARIABILITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of dedicated breast PET (dbPET) parallel imaging in mammographically or sonographically detected BI-RADS 4 (Breast Imaging Reporting And Data Systems) lesions. Materials and methods: After institutional review board and patient approvals, 50 consecutive women with 60 BI-RADS 4 breast lesions were prospectively included in the study. All patients underwent Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and dbPET before biopsy and fusion of both MRI and dbPET images was performed to better locate corresponding lesions. Final findings were compared with histological results. Sensitivity and specificity for dbPET were determined along with their respective 95%-confidence intervals. Results: Histopathology examination revealed 18 malignant lesions (7 in situ and 11 invasive carcinomas) and 42 benign entities. The dedicated breast PET reported no evidence of malignancy in 41 patients, 9 of them with histological diagnosis of neoplasm. Besides, dbPET showed increased metabolically activity in 10 benign lesions and in 9 breast cancers. Two invasive carcinomas were located less than 1 cm from the pectoral muscle, which can explain that they were missed by dbPET because they were outside the field of view (FOV). There were other 6 false negative results, which corresponded to a 0.1 cm invasive lobular carcinoma and 5 in situ carcinomas. Sensitivity and specificity of dbPET were 50% and 76%, respectively. Conclusions: Our analysis does not allow the recommendation of dbPET for diagnosis of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic or US abnormalities, mainly due to its high false-negative rate for the detection of in situ carcinomas (85.7%). However, considering the lesions greater than 0.1 cm and included in the FOV, dbPET depicted all invasive carcinomas.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 207
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] False-Positive Lesions Mimicking Breast Cancer on FDG PET and PET/CT
    Adejolu, Margaret
    Huo, Lei
    Rohren, Eric
    Santiago, Lumarie
    Yang, Wei T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (03) : W304 - W314
  • [2] Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: correlation with pathological findings
    Aseret Ramirez-Galvan, Yazmin
    Cardona-Huerta, Servando
    Ibarra-Fombona, Elfa
    Elizondo-Riojas, Guillermo
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [3] MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bennani-Baiti, Barbara
    Baltzer, Pascal A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 283 (03) : 691 - 700
  • [4] Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?
    Bitencourt, Almir G. V.
    Lima, Eduardo N. P.
    Macedo, Bruna R. C.
    Conrado, Jorge L. F. A.
    Marques, Elvira F.
    Chojniak, Rubens
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (05) : 1893 - 1900
  • [5] Bitencourt Almir Galvão Vieira, 2014, Radiol Bras, V47, P67, DOI 10.1590/S0100-39842014000200006
  • [6] FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0
    Boellaard, Ronald
    Delgado-Bolton, Roberto
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    Giammarile, Francesco
    Tatsch, Klaus
    Eschner, Wolfgang
    Verzijlbergen, Fred J.
    Barrington, Sally F.
    Pike, Lucy C.
    Weber, Wolfgang A.
    Stroobants, Sigrid
    Delbeke, Dominique
    Donohoe, Kevin J.
    Holbrook, Scott
    Graham, Michael M.
    Testanera, Giorgio
    Hoekstra, Otto S.
    Zijlstra, Josee
    Visser, Eric
    Hoekstra, Corneline J.
    Pruim, Jan
    Willemsen, Antoon
    Arends, Bertjan
    Kotzerke, Joerg
    Bockisch, Andreas
    Beyer, Thomas
    Chiti, Arturo
    Krause, Bernd J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) : 328 - 354
  • [7] Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation
    Elverici, Eda
    Barca, Ayse Nurdan
    Aktas, Hafize
    Ozsoy, Arzu
    Zengin, Betul
    Cavusoglu, Mehtap
    Araz, Levent
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (03) : 189 - 194
  • [8] A Molecular Approach to Breast Imaging
    Fowler, Amy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55 (02) : 177 - 180
  • [9] Pathologic Findings of Breast Lesions Detected on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Jabbar, Seema B.
    Lynch, Beverly
    Seiler, Stephen
    Hwang, Helena
    Sahoo, Sunati
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 141 (11) : 1513 - 1522
  • [10] Koolen BB, 2013, Q J NUCL MED MOL IM, V57, P92