Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease

被引:119
作者
Lipham, J. C. [1 ]
Taiganides, P. A. [2 ]
Louie, B. E. [3 ,4 ]
Ganz, R. A. [5 ]
DeMeester, T. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Med Ctr USC, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Knox Community Hosp, Mt Vernon, OH USA
[3] Swedish Med Ctr, Div Thorac Surg, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Inst Canc Res, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Abbott NW Hosp, Minnesota Gastroenterol, Minneapolis, MN 55407 USA
关键词
antireflux surgery; complication; gastroesophageal reflux disease; lower esophageal sphincter; TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION; LAPAROSCOPIC NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION; FAILED ANTIREFLUX SURGERY; CLINICAL-TRIAL; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; EXPERIENCE; EFFICACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1111/dote.12199
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Antireflux surgery with a magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSAD) restores the competency of the lower esophageal sphincter with a device rather than a tissue fundoplication. As a regulated device, safety information from the published clinical literature can be supplemented by tracking under the Safe Medical Devices Act. The aim of this study was to examine the safety profile of the MSAD in the first 1000 implanted patients. We compiled safety data from all available sources as of July 1, 2013. The analysis included intra/perioperative complications, hospital readmissions, procedure-related interventions, reoperations, and device malfunctions leading to injury or inability to complete the procedure. Over 1000 patients worldwide have been implanted with the MSAD at 82 institutions with median implant duration of 274 days. Event rates were 0.1% intra/perioperative complications, 1.3% hospital readmissions, 5.6% endoscopic dilations, and 3.4% reoperations. All reoperations were performed non-emergently for device removal, with no complications or conversion to laparotomy. The primary reason for device removal was dysphagia. No device migrations or malfunctions were reported. Erosion of the device occurred in one patient (0.1%). The safety analysis of the first 1000 patients treated with MSAD for gastroesophageal reflux disease confirms the safety of this device and the implantation technique. The overall event rates were low based on data from 82 institutions. The MSAD is a safe therapeutic option for patients with chronic, uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 311
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Reoperative Antireflux Surgery for Failed Fundoplication: An Analysis of Outcomes in 275 Patients [J].
Awais, Omar ;
Luketich, James D. ;
Schuchert, Matthew J. ;
Morse, Christopher R. ;
Wilson, Jonathan ;
Gooding, William E. ;
Landreneau, Rodney J. ;
Pennathur, Arjun .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (03) :1083-1090
[2]   Randomized double-blind trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus anterior partial fundoplication [J].
Baigrie, RJ ;
Cullis, SNR ;
Ndhluni, AJ ;
Cariem, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (07) :819-823
[3]   One Hundred Consecutive Patients Treated with Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: 6 Years of Clinical Experience from a Single Center [J].
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Saino, Greta ;
Bona, Davide ;
Sironi, Andrea ;
Lazzari, Veronica .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (04) :577-585
[4]   Magnetic Augmentation of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter: Results of a Feasibility Clinical Trial [J].
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Saino, Greta I. ;
Bona, Davide ;
Lipham, John ;
Ganz, Robert A. ;
Dunn, Daniel ;
DeMeester, Tom .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (12) :2133-2140
[5]   Outcomes for Trainees vs Experienced Surgeons Undertaking Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery - Is Equipoise Achieved? [J].
Brown, Claire N. ;
Smith, Lorelle T. ;
Watson, David I. ;
Devitt, Peter G. ;
Thompson, Sarah K. ;
Jamieson, Glyn G. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (07) :1173-1180
[6]   LAPAROSCOPIC NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION - TECHNIQUE AND PRELIMINARY-RESULTS [J].
CADIERE, GB ;
HOUBEN, JJ ;
BRUYNS, J ;
HIMPENS, J ;
PANZER, JM ;
GELIN, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (03) :400-403
[7]   Antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX:: 12-month results of a prospective multicenter study [J].
Cadiere, Guy-Bernard ;
Buset, Michel ;
Muls, Vinciane ;
Rajan, Amin ;
Roesch, Thomas ;
Eckardt, Alexander J. ;
Weerts, Joseph ;
Bastens, Boris ;
Costamagna, Guido ;
Marchese, Michele ;
Louis, Hubert ;
Mana, Fazia ;
Sermon, Filip ;
Gawlicka, Anna K. ;
Daniel, Michael A. ;
Deviere, Jacques .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (08) :1676-1688
[8]   Complications and results of primary minimally invasive antireflux procedures: A review of 10,735 reported cases [J].
Carlson, MA ;
Frantzides, CT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2001, 193 (04) :428-439
[9]   Revisional Surgery for Failed Antireflux Surgery [J].
Chukwumah, Chike V. ;
Ponsky, Jeffrey L. .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2010, 20 (05) :326-331
[10]  
Darling Gail, 2005, Thorac Surg Clin, V15, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2005.04.003