Radiographic outcome of limb-based versus knee-based patient specific guides in total knee arthroplasty

被引:5
作者
Crane, Catherine [1 ]
Marimuthu, Kanniraj [2 ]
Chen, Darren B. [1 ,2 ]
Harris, Ian A. [3 ]
Wheatley, Emma [4 ]
MacDessi, Samuel J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Canterbury Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Canterbury, NSW, Australia
[2] Sydney Knee Specialists, St George Private Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] UNSW, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] St George Private Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Patient specific guides; Radiographic outcomes; Knee arthroplasty; Alignment; CT Perth protocol; ALIGNMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; REPLACEMENT; ACCURACY; SURGERY; TKA; ROTATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient specific guides (PSG's) were developed to improve overall component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (MA). The aim of this study was to undertake a comparative radiographic study of two commonly used PSG and determine whether the radiographic technique used to construct the PSG had a significant effect on overall alignment. Methods: This prospective cohort study examined the accuracy of limb-based (n = 112) versus knee-based (n = 105) MR PSG in restoring the mechanical axis in three planes according to post-operative Perth CT scan protocol. Results: Limb-based MR and knee-based MR PSG systems both restored overall hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), femoral coronal alignment, tibial coronal alignment, femoral sagittal alignment, tibial sagittal alignment and femoral rotation alignment to within 30 of a neutral mechanical axis with similar precision (91.1% vs. 86.7% p = 030, 97.3% vs. 96.2% p = 0.63, 97.3% vs. 97.1% p = 0.94,94.6% vs. 89.4% p = 0.16, 90.2% vs. 81.0% p = 0.05, 91.1% vs. 86.7% p = 0.30, respectively). However, when the secondary outcome measure of alignment within 2 was assessed, limb-based MR PSG restored HKAA, femoral coronal and tibial sagittal alignment with greater precision than knee-based MR PSG (73.2% vs. 64.8% p = 0.016, 93.8% vs. 80.8% p = 0.004 and 82.1% vs. 62.9% p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The findings of this study recommend the use of limb-based MR PSG for improved precision in the restoration of neutral mechanical alignment over knee-based MR PSG in MA. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1244 / 1249
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   3D templating and patient-specific cutting guides (Knee-Plan®) in total knee arthroplasty: Postoperative CT-based assessment of implant positioning [J].
Franceschi, J. -P. ;
Sbihi, A. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2014, 100 (06) :S281-S286
[22]   Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review [J].
Nam, Denis ;
McArthur, Benjamin A. ;
Cross, Michael B. ;
Pearle, Andrew D. ;
Mayman, David J. ;
Haas, Steven B. .
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2012, 25 (03) :213-219
[23]   Patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Chan, Warwick Chun-Wang ;
Pinder, Elizabeth ;
Loeffler, Mark .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2016, 24 (02) :175-178
[24]   A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement [J].
Krishnan, S. P. ;
Dawood, A. ;
Richards, R. ;
Henckel, J. ;
Hart, A. J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (11) :1457-1461
[25]   Assessing the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty [J].
Jong-Keun Seon ;
Hyeong-Won Park ;
Seung-Hyun Yoo ;
Eun-Kyoo Song .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 :3678-3683
[26]   Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Jauregui, Julio J. ;
Cherian, Jeffrey J. ;
Kapadia, Bhaveen H. ;
Banerjee, Samik ;
Issa, Kimona ;
Harwin, Steven F. ;
Mont, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2014, 27 (03) :177-183
[27]   Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation [J].
Boonen, Bert ;
Schotanus, Martijn G. M. ;
Kerens, Bart ;
Hulsmans, Frans-Jan ;
Tuinebreijer, Wim E. ;
Kort, Nanne P. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (09) :2809-2817
[28]   Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Nam, Denis ;
Maher, Patrick A. ;
Rebolledo, Brian J. ;
Nawabi, Danyal H. ;
McLawhorn, Alexander S. ;
Pearle, Andrew D. .
KNEE, 2013, 20 (04) :263-267
[29]   Patient-Specific CT-Based Instrumentation versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on Clinical Outcomes and In-Hospital Data [J].
Kotela, Andrzej ;
Lorkowski, Jacek ;
Kucharzewski, Marek ;
Wilk-Franczuk, Magdalena ;
Sliwinski, Zbigniew ;
Franczuk, Boguslaw ;
Legosz, Pawel ;
Kotela, Ireneusz .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
[30]   Comparative Study for Alignment of Extramedullary Guides versus Portable, Accelerometer-Based Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Matsumoto, Kazu ;
Ogawa, Hiroyasu ;
Fukuta, Masashi ;
Mori, Nobuyuki ;
Akiyama, Haruhiko .
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (01) :92-98