Microbial growth modelling with artificial neural networks

被引:106
作者
Jeyamkondan, S
Jayas, DS
Holley, RA
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Biosyst Engn, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Food Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
predictive microbiology; artificial neural networks; general regression network; microbial modelling; polynomial regression models;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00483-9
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
There is a growing interest in modelling microbial growth as an alternative to time-consuming, traditional, microbiological enumeration techniques. Several statistical models have been reported to describe the growth of different microorganisms, bur there are accuracy problems. An alternate technique 'artificial neural networks' (ANN) for modelling microbial growth is explained and evaluated. Published data were used to build separate general regression neural network (GRNN) structures for modelling growth of Aeromonas hydrophila, Shigella flexneri, and Brochothrix thermosphacta. Both GRNN and published statistical model predictions were compared against the experimental data using six statistical indices. For training data sets, the GRNN predictions were far superior than the statistical model predictions, whereas the GRNN predictions were similar or slightly worse than statistical model predictions for test data sets for all thr three data sits. GRNN predictions can be considered good, considering its performance for unseen data. Graphical plots, mean relative percentage residual, mean absolute relative residual, and root mean squared residual were identified as suitable indices for comparing competing models. ANN can now become a vehicle whereby predictive microbiology can be applied in food product development and food safety risk assessment. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 354
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combining first principles modelling and artificial neural networks: a general framework
    Oliveira, R
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 28 (05) : 755 - 766
  • [42] Comparing Multilevel Modelling and Artificial Neural Networks in House Price Prediction
    Feng, Yingyu
    Jones, Kelvyn
    PROCEEDINGS 2015 SECOND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPATIAL DATA MINING AND GEOGRAPHICAL KNOWLEDGE SERVICES (ICSDM 2015), 2015, : 108 - 114
  • [43] Artificial neural networks for modelling and predictive control of an industrial evaporation process
    Benne, M
    Grondin-Perez, B
    Chabriat, JP
    Hervé, P
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2000, 46 (04) : 227 - 234
  • [44] Wear of railway tyre steels modelling using artificial neural networks
    WITASZEK M.
    WITASZEK K.
    Tribologia, 2020, 294 (06): : 77 - 85
  • [45] Modelling the Concentration Distributions of Aerosol Puffs Using Artificial Neural Networks
    Xiaoying Cao
    Gilles Roy
    William S. Andrews
    Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2010, 136 : 83 - 103
  • [46] Improving microbial growth prediction by product unit neural networks
    Hervás-Martínez, C
    García-Gimeno, RM
    Martínez-Estudillo, AC
    Martínez-Estudillo, FJ
    Zurera-Cosano, G
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2006, 71 (02) : M31 - M38
  • [47] Prediction of microbial activity during biosolids composting using artificial neural networks
    Liang, C
    Das, KC
    McClendon, RW
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2003, 46 (06): : 1713 - 1719
  • [48] Application of artificial neural networks in tendency forecasting of economic growth
    Feng, Lihua
    Zhang, Jianzhen
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 40 : 76 - 80
  • [49] Backfilling missing microbial concentrations in a riverine database using artificial neural networks
    Chandramouli, V.
    Brion, Gail
    Neelakantan, T. R.
    Lingireddy, Srinivasa
    WATER RESEARCH, 2007, 41 (01) : 217 - 227
  • [50] Artificial neural network (ANN) modelling for the estimation of soil microbial biomass in vineyard soils
    Elisa Pellegrini
    Nicola Rovere
    Stefano Zaninotti
    Irene Franco
    Maria De Nobili
    Marco Contin
    Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2021, 57 : 145 - 151