Change in research and in higher education institutions: forms of resistance in a research-action project

被引:5
作者
Diogo, Sara [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jordao, Carina [1 ]
Carvalho, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Himi, Hana [4 ]
Ashkenazi, Maya [4 ]
Meskova, Veronika [5 ]
Thaler, Anita [6 ]
Dahmen-Adkins, Jennifer [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Dept Social Polit & Terr Sci, Aveiro, Portugal
[2] CIPES, Res Ctr Higher Educ Policies, Matosinhos, Portugal
[3] GOVCOPP, Res Unit Governance Competitiveness & Publ Polici, Aveiro, Portugal
[4] BBC, Beit Berl Acad Coll, Beit Berl, Israel
[5] Zilinska Univ Ziline, Vyskumne Ctr, Zilina, Slovakia
[6] Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Technol Work & Culture, Graz, Austria
[7] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Soziol, Aachen, Germany
来源
INVESTIGACIONES FEMINISTAS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
research performing/funding organisations; gender equality; knowledge-to-action gap; resistances; structural and cultural challenges; GENDER; EQUALITY;
D O I
10.5209/infe.72054
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Introduction. Funded under the Horizon 2020 programme, the CHANGE project -Challenging Gender (In) Equality in Science and Research- aims to create and implement tailor-made gender equality plans (GEPs) in research performing organisations (RPOs). To make GEPs more sustainable, efforts are being made to stimulate institutional cultural change towards gender equal work environments and foster the gender dimension and inclusive research and innovation programmes in research funding organisations (RFOs) as well. The promotion of a gender equality culture is thus a key requirement for RPOs to maximise their potential. The CHANGE consortium is composed of seven institutions from six countries -Austria, Germany, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Israel- of which five are GEP implementing partners and two are experienced partners (one coordinator and one internal evaluator). Objectives and Methodology. This paper approaches the methodology of the project and the structural and cultural challenges faced by the implementing partners so far, looking more specifically to the similarities and differences in the different national and institutional contexts. Results and Discussion. In all the five implementing partners organisations, successful steps have been taken in the implementation of GEPs. Regardless of these first successes, even with increasing women's representation in management and decisionmaking positions in some specific cases, implementing partners and coordinators fear that this change may be merely circumstantial or only due and during the project duration. Contribution. The challenges and barriers faced so far to stimulate institutional and cultural change towards gender equal work environments in RPOs are diverse. While there are important social, cultural, and institutional differences among the partner institutions, there is a great similarity in the difficulties faced in implementing GEPs. Resistances and challenges that emerge during processes of change when gender equality policies are implemented in RPOs are more transversal to different national and organisational contexts than one could expect.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 295
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Women academics and research productivity: an international comparison
    Aiston, Sarah Jane
    Jung, Jisun
    [J]. GENDER AND EDUCATION, 2015, 27 (03) : 205 - 220
  • [2] Antoniou AS, 2019, NEW HORIZ INNO MANAG, P94
  • [3] Transformational change towards gender equality: An autobiographical reflection on resistance during participatory action research
    Bleijenbergh, Inge
    [J]. ORGANIZATION, 2018, 25 (01) : 131 - 138
  • [4] COM-European Commission, 2020, UN EQ GEND EQ STRAT UN EQ GEND EQ STRAT
  • [5] Crenshaw K., 1989, UNIV CHICAGO LEG FOR, V1, P137, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780429500480-5
  • [6] Creswell J. W., 2017, QUAL INQ
  • [7] Dahmen-Adkins Jennifer, 2019, C CRIT ISS SCI TECHN C CRIT ISS SCI TECHN
  • [8] De Villota P, 2016, INVESTIG FEM, V7, P1
  • [9] EIGE-European Institute for Gender Equality, 2019, ED REL GEND POL AR ED REL GEND POL AR
  • [10] Husu L., 2000, HIGHER ED EUROPE, V25, P221, DOI [DOI 10.1080/713669257, 10.1080/713669257]