A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund in Australia

被引:3
|
作者
Bala, Chandra [1 ,7 ]
Athanasiov, Paul [2 ]
Holland, Jason [3 ]
Dhariwal, Mukesh [4 ]
Gupta, Amit [5 ]
Rathi, Hemant [6 ]
机构
[1] personalEYES Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Eye Surg SA, North Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Eye Hlth Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Alcon Vis LLC, Ft Worth, TX USA
[5] Skyward Analyt Pvt Ltd, Gurgaon, India
[6] Skyward Analyt Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
[7] personalEYES Pty Ltd, Level2,33 York St, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2022年 / 16卷
关键词
cataract surgery; ATIOL; EDoF; presbyopia; ICER; quality of life; CATARACT-SURGERY; IMPLANTATION; PATIENT;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S370420
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: AcrySof IQ Vivity is a unique non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens with wavefront-shaping X-WAVE technology. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens (DFT015) compared with standard aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (SN60WF), from a private health fund perspective in Australia. Methods: A Markov model was developed using the following health states: well, need for spectacles (near/distance/bifocal/varifocal), very bothersome visual disturbances (glare/haloes/starbursts) - with/without spectacles, and death. Model inputs were sourced from a randomized clinical study (NCT03010254), published literature, prostheses list and clinical opinion. A lifetime horizon (up to 30 years) was considered, and cost and health outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum. Model outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio defined as incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gain. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted. Results: Bilateral implantation of DFT015 intraocular lens provided quality adjusted life year gain of 0.16 at an incremental cost of AU$307 compared to bilateral SN60WF, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AU$1908/quality adjusted life year, well below the cost-effectiveness threshold (Range: AU$45,000-AU$75,000) typically used by Medical Services Advisory Committee in Australia. Results were most sensitive to intraocular lens costs, post-operative spectacle dependence, and disutility due to wearing glasses. Robustness of the results was further confirmed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses. Conclusion: AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens is a highly cost-effective treatment strategy with improved vision-related quality of life outcomes for presbyopic cataract surgery patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2403 / 2412
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness analysis in a randomized trial of late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation surgery: repositioning versus exchange
    Kristianslund, Olav
    Dalby, Marius
    Moe, Morten C.
    Drolsum, Liv
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2019, 97 (08) : 771 - 777
  • [2] Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of lung cancer screening for Australia, capturing differences in the health economic impact of NELSON and NLST outcomes
    Harpaz, Silvia Behar
    Weber, Marianne F.
    Wade, Stephen
    Ngo, Preston J.
    Vaneckova, Pavla
    Sarich, Peter E. A.
    Cressman, Sonya
    Tammemagi, Martin C.
    Fong, Kwun
    Marshall, Henry
    McWilliams, Annette
    Zalcberg, John R.
    Caruana, Michael
    Canfell, Karen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 128 (01) : 91 - 101
  • [3] Angle-supported intraocular lens versus scleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens in post-cataract surgery aphakic patients: two-year follow-up cost-effectiveness analysis
    Ranno, Stefano
    Rabbiolo, Giovanni Mario
    Lucentini, Stefano
    Ruggiero, Edoardo
    Luccarelli, Saverio Vincenzo
    Lombardi, Linda
    Nucci, Paolo
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (03) : 871 - 879
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in Singapore from a health system perspective
    Meng, Fanwen
    Ang, Gary Yee
    Chang, Ruth Rui Ying
    Lee, Chuen Peng
    Tan, Kelvin Bryan
    Abisheganaden, John Arputhan
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2025, 34 (02)
  • [5] Secondary Prevention via Case Managers in Stroke Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Claims Data from German Statutory Health Insurance Providers
    Duevel, Juliane A.
    Gruhn, Sebastian
    Grosser, John
    Elkenkamp, Svenja
    Greiner, Wolfgang
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness analysis: fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from the perspective of the Chilean public health system
    Balmaceda, Carlos
    Espinoza, Manuel A.
    Abbott, Tomas
    Peters, Anne
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (05) : 743 - 751
  • [7] Cost-Effectiveness of Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Germany: Model Analysis From the Perspective of Germany's Statutory Health Insurance System
    Neubauer, Aljoscha S.
    Holz, Frank G.
    Sauer, Stefan
    Wasmuth, Timo
    Hirneiss, Christoph
    Kampik, Anselm
    Schrader, Wolfgang
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (07) : 1343 - 1356
  • [8] Costs and expected gain in lifetime health from intensive care versus general ward care of 30,712 individual patients: a distribution-weighted cost-effectiveness analysis
    Lindemark, Frode
    Haaland, Oystein A.
    Kvale, Reidar
    Flaatten, Hans
    Norheim, Ole F.
    Johansson, Kjell A.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 21
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness analysis of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine u100 for the management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus - from the Spanish National Health System perspective
    Mezquita-Raya, Pedro
    Darba, Josep
    Ascanio, Meritxell
    Ramirez de Arellano, Antonio
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (06) : 587 - 595