An electronic nose in the discrimination of breath from smokers and non-smokers: a model for toxin exposure

被引:50
作者
Cheng, Z. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Warwick, G. [4 ]
Yates, D. H. [4 ]
Thomas, P. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Ctr Infect & Inflammat Res, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[4] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Thorac Med, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
关键词
EXHALED NITRIC-OXIDE; LUNG-CANCER; SMOKING; BIOMARKERS; ARRAY;
D O I
10.1088/1752-7155/3/3/036003
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Exhaled breath contains hundreds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may be used as non-invasive markers of lung disease. Electronic noses (e-noses) can analyse VOCs by composite nanosensor arrays with learning algorithms. This study investigated the use of an e-nose (Cyranose C320) to distinguish the breath of smokers from that of non-smokers. Smoking and non-smoking subjects exhaled from total lung capacity into a 2 L Tedlar bag and these samples were introduced offline to the e-nose in a random order. Two classes of breath, 'smoker' and 'non-smoker', were established and this model was then cross-validated. Principal component analysis then identified the maximal point of difference between classes. Smellprints of breath from smokers were separated from those of non-smokers (cross-validation value, 95%; Mahalanobis distance, 3.96). Subsequently, 15 smokers (mean age 37.9 +/- 4.78 years, FEV1 3.15 +/- 0.21 L), and 24 non-smokers (add mean age and FEV1 as for smokers) were sampled to revalidate the model. The e-nose correctly identified the smoking status in 37 of the 39 subjects. This demonstrates that the e-nose is simple to use in clinical practice and can differentiate the breath of smokers from that of non-smokers. It may prove to be a useful, non-invasive tool for further breath assessment of exposure to other inhaled noxious substances as well as disease monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Guidelines for Controlling and Monitoring the Tobacco Epidemic
[2]   Analysis of exhaled breath from smokers, passive smokers and non-smokers by solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography/mass spectrometry [J].
Buszewski, Boguslaw ;
Ulanowska, Agnieszka ;
Ligor, Tomasz ;
Denderz, Natalia ;
Amann, Anton .
BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2009, 23 (05) :551-556
[3]   Lung cancer identification by the analysis of breath by means of an array of non-selective gas sensors [J].
Di Natale, C ;
Macagnano, A ;
Martinelli, E ;
Paolesse, R ;
D'Arcangelo, G ;
Roscioni, C ;
Finazzi-Agrò, A ;
D'Amico, A .
BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 2003, 18 (10) :1209-1218
[4]   An electronic nose in the discrimination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and COPD [J].
Dragonieri, Silvano ;
Annema, Jouke T. ;
Schot, Robert ;
van der Schee, Marc P. C. ;
Spanevello, Antonio ;
Carratu, Pierluigi ;
Resta, Onofrio ;
Rabe, Klaus F. ;
Sterk, Peter J. .
LUNG CANCER, 2009, 64 (02) :166-170
[5]   Volatile organic compounds as breath biomarkers for active and passive smoking [J].
Gordon, SM ;
Wallace, LA ;
Brinkman, MC ;
Callahan, PJ ;
Kenny, DV .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 110 (07) :689-698
[6]  
KISCH W, 2004, CLIN CHIM ACTA, V347, P25
[7]   Detection of lung cancer by sensor array analyses of exhaled breath [J].
Machado, RF ;
Laskowski, D ;
Deffenderfer, O ;
Burch, T ;
Zheng, S ;
Mazzone, PJ ;
Mekhail, T ;
Jennings, C ;
Stoller, JK ;
Pyle, J ;
Duncan, J ;
Dweik, RA ;
Erzurum, SC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 171 (11) :1286-1291
[8]   How many ways can we say that cigarette smoking is bad for you? [J].
Mazzone, PJ ;
Arroliga, AC .
CHEST, 2004, 126 (06) :1717-1718
[9]   Impact of sampling procedures on the results of breath analysis [J].
Miekisch, Wolfram ;
Kischkel, Sabine ;
Sawacki, Annika ;
Liebau, Tina ;
Mieth, Maren ;
Schubert, Jochen K. .
JOURNAL OF BREATH RESEARCH, 2008, 2 (02)
[10]   Indirect monitoring of lung inflammation [J].
Montuschi, P .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2002, 1 (03) :238-242