Exposure Determination in Gamma-Ray Radiography for Mammography Applications

被引:1
作者
Taha, Eslam M. [1 ,2 ]
Alhawsawi, Abdulsalam M. [1 ,2 ]
Mohammed, Mohammed Siddig H. [1 ]
Balamesh, Ahmed [3 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Engn, Nucl Engn Dept, POB 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Ctr Training & Radiat Prevent, POB 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Elect & Comp Engn Dept, POB 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Mammography; Gamma-ray imaging; Radiography; GATE simulation; X-ray; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1007/s13369-021-06322-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Previous studies explored the feasibility of using gamma-ray as an alternative to X-ray in medical imaging. The feasibility studies reported that gamma radiography could be an effective alternative to X-ray radiography. Exposure is the factor that decides noise level and contrast quality in the produced image; the two crucial factors for the diagnosis and patient safety. This research aims to foster the feasibility of gamma-ray mammography by proposing a method for exposure determination. Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission toolkit was used to simulate the required exposure on the American College of Radiology Mammography phantom using photon energies of 17.5, 19, 20, 22, 23.5, 25, 26, 27.5, and 30 keV. The quality of the produced image was evaluated against a reference experimental X-ray mammographic image. A visual assessment procedure was adopted to determine the minimum contrast-to-noise ratio required to detect the various sets of phantom features. Based on the visual assessment, a method for exposure determination was established and verified. The results will support the application of radioisotopes for mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:7583 / 7591
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Adejoh T, 2016, HEALTH, V8, P953, DOI DOI 10.4236/HEALTH.2016.810098
[2]   Feasibility study of gamma-ray medical radiography [J].
Alyassin, Abdalmajeid M. ;
Maqsoud, Hamza A. ;
Mashat, Ahmad M. ;
Al-Mohr, Al-Sayed ;
Abdulwajid, Subhan .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2013, 72 :16-29
[3]  
Alyassin AMA., 2016, INSIGHTS MED PHYS, V1, P1
[4]  
Bushberg J.T., 2012, ESSENTIAL PHYS MED I, V3
[5]   Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation [J].
Butler, M. L. ;
Rainford, L. ;
Last, J. ;
Brennan, P. C. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2010, 139 (1-3) :371-374
[6]   Monte Carlo simulation on heterogeneous distributed systems: A computing framework with parallel merging and checkpointing strategies [J].
Camarasu-Pop, Sorina ;
Glatard, Tristan ;
da Silva, Rafael Ferreira ;
Gueth, Pierre ;
Sarrut, David ;
Benoit-Cattin, Hugues .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2013, 29 (03) :728-738
[7]   Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review [J].
Ching, William ;
Robinson, John ;
McEntee, Mark .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2014, 61 (03) :176-190
[8]   New Exposure Indicators for Digital Radiography Simplified for Radiologists and Technologists [J].
Don, Steven ;
Whiting, Bruce R. ;
Rutz, Lois Jo ;
Apgar, Bruce K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (06) :1337-1341
[9]  
Gagliardi F, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3402, P194
[10]  
Johnson T., 2017, Introduction To Health Physics