Prayer as a pain intervention: protocol of a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

被引:6
作者
Ferreira-Valente, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Jarego, Margarida [1 ]
Queiroz-Garcia, Ines [1 ]
Pimenta, Filipa [1 ]
Costa, Rui Miguel [1 ]
Day, Melissa A. [2 ,3 ]
Pais-Ribeiro, Jose [1 ]
Jensen, Mark P. [2 ]
机构
[1] ISPA Univ Inst, William James Ctr Res, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
pain management; complementary medicine; statistics & research methods; HEALTH; STRESS; METAANALYSIS; ANXIETY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Pain is a universal experience and the most common reason for seeking healthcare. Inadequate pain management negatively impacts numerous aspects of patient health. Multidisciplinary treatment programmes, including psychosocial interventions, are more useful for pain management than purely biomedical treatment alone. Recently, researchers showed increasing interest in understanding the role of spirituality/religiosity and spiritual/religious practices on pain experience, with engagement in religious practices, such as prayer, showing to positively impact pain experience in religious individuals. This systematic review will seek to summarise and integrate the existing findings from randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of prayer and prayer-based interventions on pain experience. Methods The systematic review procedures and its report will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Electronic searches in nine databases (Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, SCIELO Citation Index, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trial, PsycINFO, Scopus, LILACS and Open-SIGLE) will be performed to identify randomised controlled trials of prayer-based interventions. Two independent researchers will assess studies for inclusion and extract data from each paper. Risk of bias assessment will be assessed independently by two reviewers based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. Qualitative synthesis of the body of research will be conducted using a narrative summary synthesis method. Meta-analysis will be limited to studies reporting on the same primary outcome. Formal searches are planned to start in June 2021. The final report is anticipated to be completed by September 2021. Discussion Findings will be useful to (1) understand the condition of our knowledge in this field and (2) provide evidence for prayer effectiveness in reducing pain intensity and pain-related stress and increasing pain tolerance in adults experiencing acute or chronic pain. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020221733.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Acupuncture for smoking cessation: A protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Lee, Ju Ah
    Choi, Jiae
    Jun, Ji Hee
    Choi, Tae-Young
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Jang, Soobin
    Park, Sunju
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 12 : 35 - 37
  • [42] Addition of corticosteroids to local anaesthetics for chronic non-cancer pain injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    Busse, Jason
    Wang, Li
    Kaushal, Alka
    Harsha, Prathiba
    Suzumura, Erica A.
    Bhardwaj, Varun
    Zhou, Edward
    Couban, Rachel
    Paul, James
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Thabane, Lehana
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (05) : 779 - 801
  • [43] Costs and consequences of acupuncture as a treatment for chronic pain: A systematic review of economic evaluations conducted alongside randomised controlled trials
    Ambrosio, E. M. M.
    Bloor, K.
    MacPherson, H.
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2012, 20 (05) : 364 - 374
  • [44] Efficacy of kinesio taping in treatment of shoulder pain and disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Ghozy, Sherief
    Nguyen Minh Dung
    Morra, Mostafa Ebraheem
    Morsy, Sara
    Elsayed, Ghadeer Gamal
    Linh Tran
    Le Huu Nhat Minh
    Abbas, Alzhraa Salah
    Tran Thai Huu Loc
    Truong Hong Hieu
    Truong Cong Dung
    Nguyen Tien Huy
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2020, 107 : 176 - 188
  • [45] Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Searle, Angela
    Spink, Martin
    Ho, Alan
    Chuter, Vivienne
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 29 (12) : 1155 - 1167
  • [46] Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo/sham controlled randomised trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain
    Duarte, Rui, V
    Nevitt, Sarah
    McNicol, Ewan
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Buchser, Eric
    North, Richard B.
    Eldabe, Sam
    PAIN, 2020, 161 (01) : 24 - 35
  • [47] Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in burns care. A systematic review
    Danilla, Stefan
    Wasiak, Jason
    Searle, Susana
    Arriagada, Cristian
    Pedreros, Cesar
    Cleland, Heather
    Spinks, Anneliese
    BURNS, 2009, 35 (07) : 956 - 961
  • [48] The clinical effectiveness of transurethral incision of the prostate: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Lourenco, Tania
    Shaw, Matthew
    Fraser, Cynthia
    MacLennan, Graeme
    N'Dow, James
    Pickard, Robert
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (01) : 23 - 32
  • [49] Low intensity pulsed ultrasonography for fractures: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Busse, Jason W.
    Kaur, Jagdeep
    Mollon, Brent
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Tornetta, Paul, III
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338
  • [50] The clinical effectiveness of transurethral incision of the prostate: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Tania Lourenco
    Matthew Shaw
    Cynthia Fraser
    Graeme MacLennan
    James N’Dow
    Robert Pickard
    World Journal of Urology, 2010, 28 : 23 - 32