Prayer as a pain intervention: protocol of a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

被引:6
|
作者
Ferreira-Valente, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Jarego, Margarida [1 ]
Queiroz-Garcia, Ines [1 ]
Pimenta, Filipa [1 ]
Costa, Rui Miguel [1 ]
Day, Melissa A. [2 ,3 ]
Pais-Ribeiro, Jose [1 ]
Jensen, Mark P. [2 ]
机构
[1] ISPA Univ Inst, William James Ctr Res, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
pain management; complementary medicine; statistics & research methods; HEALTH; STRESS; METAANALYSIS; ANXIETY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Pain is a universal experience and the most common reason for seeking healthcare. Inadequate pain management negatively impacts numerous aspects of patient health. Multidisciplinary treatment programmes, including psychosocial interventions, are more useful for pain management than purely biomedical treatment alone. Recently, researchers showed increasing interest in understanding the role of spirituality/religiosity and spiritual/religious practices on pain experience, with engagement in religious practices, such as prayer, showing to positively impact pain experience in religious individuals. This systematic review will seek to summarise and integrate the existing findings from randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of prayer and prayer-based interventions on pain experience. Methods The systematic review procedures and its report will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Electronic searches in nine databases (Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, SCIELO Citation Index, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trial, PsycINFO, Scopus, LILACS and Open-SIGLE) will be performed to identify randomised controlled trials of prayer-based interventions. Two independent researchers will assess studies for inclusion and extract data from each paper. Risk of bias assessment will be assessed independently by two reviewers based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. Qualitative synthesis of the body of research will be conducted using a narrative summary synthesis method. Meta-analysis will be limited to studies reporting on the same primary outcome. Formal searches are planned to start in June 2021. The final report is anticipated to be completed by September 2021. Discussion Findings will be useful to (1) understand the condition of our knowledge in this field and (2) provide evidence for prayer effectiveness in reducing pain intensity and pain-related stress and increasing pain tolerance in adults experiencing acute or chronic pain. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020221733.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is reflexology an effective intervention? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Ernst, Edzard
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2009, 191 (05) : 263 - 266
  • [2] The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: systematic review protocol
    Ntala, Chara
    Birmpili, Panagiota
    Worth, Allison
    Anderson, Niall H.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (01): : PS1 - PS8
  • [3] Interventions for hemiplegic shoulder pain: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Koog, Yun Hyung
    Jin, Sang Sik
    Yoon, Kwon
    Min, Byung-Il
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 32 (04) : 282 - 291
  • [4] Randomised controlled trials of chronic pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review
    Boulkedid, R.
    Abdou, A. Yousouf
    Desselas, E.
    Monegat, M.
    Alberti, C.
    Kaguelidou, F.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 30 : 41 - 41
  • [5] Ketamine for postoperative pain: a quantitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Elia, N.
    Tramer, M. R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 203 - 203
  • [6] Gabapentinoids for chronic low back pain: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    Gilron, Ian
    Thabane, Lehana
    Devereaux, Philip J.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    AlAmri, Rizq
    Rajarathinam, Manikandan
    Kamath, Sriganesh
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11):
  • [7] Protocol for a systematic review of reporting standards of anaesthetic interventions in randomised controlled trials
    Elliott, Lucy
    Coulman, Karen
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Qureshi, Mahim
    Watson, Sethina
    Mouton, Ronelle
    Hinchliffe, Robert J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [8] Models in the delivery of depression care: A systematic review of randomised and controlled intervention trials
    Helen Christensen
    Kathleen M Griffiths
    Amelia Gulliver
    Dannielle Clack
    Marjan Kljakovic
    Leanne Wells
    BMC Family Practice, 9
  • [9] Models in the delivery of depression care: A systematic review of randomised and controlled intervention trials
    Christensen, Helen
    Griffiths, Kathleen M.
    Gulliver, Amelia
    Clack, Dannielle
    Kljakovic, Marjan
    Wells, Leanne
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [10] MANAGEMENT OF GREATER TROCHANTERIC PAIN SYNDROME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Goh, E. L.
    Chidambaram, S.
    Lambert, J.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S520 - S520