Recovering and profiling the true segmentation structure in markets: an empirical investigation

被引:22
作者
Andrews, RL
Currim, IS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Grad Sch Management, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Mkt, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
market segmentation; finite mixture models; choice models; scanner data;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8116(03)00017-X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although a variety of approaches for inferring market segments exist, little, if any, effort has been devoted to comparing the relative validity of these approaches. This study conducts two extensive simulation experiments in a scanner data setting to empirically compare and validate alternative mixture model-based procedures for segmenting households using choice behaviors and household characteristics. Compared to existing two-stage approaches, a new method known as the joint approach produced 23-27% less error in estimates of characteristics and 30-38% less error in estimates of choice model parameters. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the joint approach, which simultaneously uses household choice and characteristic data, is shown to be superior even when one is interested in recovering only characteristic-based segments. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 192
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Parameter bias from unobserved effects in the multinomial logit model of consumer choice [J].
Abramson, C ;
Andrews, RL ;
Currim, IS ;
Jones, M .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (04) :410-426
[2]   An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representations of heterogeneity [J].
Andrews, RL ;
Ainslie, A ;
Currim, IS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (04) :479-487
[3]   Identifying segments with identical choice behaviors across product categories: An Intercategory Logit Mixture model [J].
Andrews, RL ;
Currim, IS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2002, 19 (01) :65-79
[4]   Hierarchical Bayes versus finite mixture conjoint analysis models: A comparison of fit, prediction, and partworth recovery [J].
Andrews, RL ;
Ansari, A ;
Currim, IS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (01) :87-98
[5]  
ANDREWS RL, 2003, IN PRESS J MARKETING, V40
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Marketing engineering: computer-assisted marketing analysis and planning
[8]  
DeSarbo W., 1997, Marketing Letters, V8, P335
[9]  
Frank R., 1972, MARKET SEGMENTATION
[10]   SEGMENTING MARKETS WITH CONJOINT-ANALYSIS [J].
GREEN, PE ;
KRIEGER, AM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1991, 55 (04) :20-31