Radiation for prostate cancer: use of biochemical failure as an endpoint following radiotherapy

被引:10
作者
Kuban, DA
Thames, HD
Levy, LB
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biomath, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; radiation; prostate-specific antigen; biochemical outcome; failure definition;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-003-0361-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a reliable tumor marker for prostate cancer brought significant changes in endpoints after therapy and in outcome reporting. Over the last 15 years we have collected follow-up information in this new era and struggled with failure definitions using this new tool. Parameters for failure after radiation were especially controversial due to the fact that, unlike surgery, a variable amount of normal prostate function and PSA production remained. In 1996, the ASTRO Consensus Conference established a PSA failure definition based on the available information at the time. It was commonly used for outcome reporting subsequently although criticisms have been voiced and alternate definitions proposed. A recently assembled multi-institutional database was used both for long-term outcome reporting with external beam radiation and to test various other failure definitions. A summary of these results and the associated issues are presented here.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 264
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [31] THAMES H, 2003, IN PRESS INT J RAD O
  • [32] The importance of adequate follow-up in defining treatment success after external beam irradiation for prostate cancer
    Vicini, FA
    Kestin, LL
    Martinez, AA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (03): : 553 - 561
  • [33] High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer
    Zelefsky, MJ
    Fuks, Z
    Hunt, M
    Lee, HJ
    Lombardi, D
    Ling, CC
    Reuter, VE
    Venkatraman, ES
    Leibel, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (03) : 876 - 881