Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: Endosonographic differentiation in relation to histological risk

被引:43
作者
Jeon, Seong Woo [1 ]
Park, Young Dae [1 ]
Chung, Yun Jin [1 ]
Cho, Chang Min [1 ]
Tak, Won Young [1 ]
Kweon, Young Oh [1 ]
Kim, Sung Kook [1 ]
Choi, Yong Hwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Taejon 700721, South Korea
关键词
endoscopic ultrasound; endosonography; gastrointestinal stromal tumors; mesenchymal tumors;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04767.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the endosonographic characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach according to histological risk classification. Methods: Twenty-four cases of histologically proven c-kit positive GISTs were divided into three groups according to histological risk: low risk (n = 14), intermediate risk (n = 7) and high risk (n = 3). Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features recorded were: size, ulceration, regularity of marginal border, lobulation, shape of tumor, marginal halo, homogeneity, internal echogenic or cystic foci, and the presence of exophytic development. Results: Significant differences were seen in size between the groups studied (P = 0.026). All tumors in the high risk group had mucosal ulceration, which was more commonly seen in the intermediate risk group compared to the low risk group (P = 0.014). All tumors in the high risk group had irregular borders, but only three cases out of 11 in the low risk group had irregular borders (P = 0.039). Thirteen cases in the low risk group and five cases in the intermediate risk group had an oval or round shape; however, only one case in the high risk group showed this (P = 0.043). The optimal size value for prediction of the intermediate and high risk group was 30 mm. Sensitivity and specificity with this value was 80% and 79%, respectively. Conclusion: Large, especially larger than 30 mm, GISTs of the stomach with irregular borders, mucosal ulceration and a non-oval shape on EUS suggest higher risk GISTs of the stomach. These criteria might aid in the clinical management of GISTs of the stomach.
引用
收藏
页码:2069 / 2075
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Endosonographic differentiation of benign and malignant stromal cell tumors [J].
Chak, A ;
Canto, MI ;
Rosch, T ;
Dittler, HJ ;
Hawes, RH ;
Tio, TL ;
Lightdale, CJ ;
Boyce, HW ;
Scheiman, J ;
Carpenter, SL ;
VanDam, J ;
Kochman, ML ;
Sivak, MV .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (06) :468-473
[2]   PRIMARY GASTROINTESTINAL SARCOMAS - ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC VARIABLES [J].
CONLON, KC ;
CASPER, ES ;
BRENNAN, MF .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 2 (01) :26-31
[3]   Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach [J].
Fletcher, CDM ;
Berman, JJ ;
Corless, C ;
Gorstein, F ;
Lasota, J ;
Longley, BJ ;
Miettinen, M ;
O'Leary, TJ ;
Remotti, H ;
Rubin, BP ;
Shmookler, B ;
Sobin, LH ;
Weiss, SW .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 33 (05) :459-465
[4]   Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA [J].
Levy, MJ ;
Jondal, ML ;
Clain, J ;
Wiersema, MJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (01) :101-106
[5]   EUS-guided trucut biopsy [J].
Levy, MJ ;
Wiersema, MJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (03) :417-426
[6]   Preliminary results of fine needle aspiration biopsy histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors [J].
Matsui, M ;
Goto, H ;
Niwa, Y ;
Arisawa, T ;
Hirooka, Y ;
Hayakawa, T .
ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (09) :750-755
[7]  
Nickl N, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V56, pS102
[8]   Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: new progress, new questions [J].
Nickl, NJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 20 (05) :482-487
[9]   Endosonographic evaluation of c-kit-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumor [J].
Okai, T ;
Minamoto, T ;
Ohtsubo, K ;
Minato, H ;
Kurumaya, H ;
Oda, Y ;
Mai, M ;
Sawabu, N .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2003, 28 (03) :301-307
[10]   Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours [J].
Palazzo, L ;
Landi, B ;
Cellier, C ;
Cuillerier, E ;
Roseau, G ;
Barbier, JP .
GUT, 2000, 46 (01) :88-92