共 17 条
A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2)
被引:98
作者:
Tagliafico, Alberto S.
[1
,2
]
Mariscotti, Giovanna
[3
]
Valdora, Francesca
[1
]
Durando, Manuela
[3
]
Nori, Jacopo
[4
]
La Forgia, Daniele
[5
]
Rosenberg, Ilan
[6
]
Caumo, Francesca
[7
]
Gandolfo, Nicoletta
[8
]
Sormani, Maria Pia
[9
]
Signori, Alessio
[9
]
Calabrese, Massimo
[10
]
Houssami, Nehmat
[11
]
机构:
[1] Univ Genoa, Radiol Sect, Dept Hlth Sci DISSAL, Via Pastore 1, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[2] Policlin San Martino, Emergency Radiol, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[3] Azienda Osped Univ Citta Salute & Sci Torino, Via Ventimiglia 1, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[4] Azienda Osped Univ Carreggi, Largo Brambilla 3, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[5] SSD Radiodiagnost Senol IRCCS Ist Tumori Bari Gio, Via O Flacco 65, I-70124 Bari, Italy
[6] ASL 5 Spezzino, San Bartolomeo Hosp, Radiol Unit, Via Cisa Loc Santa Caterina, I-19038 Sarzana, Italy
[7] Veneto Inst Oncol IOV IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[8] ASL 3 Genovese, SC Radiol, Dept Imaging, PO Villa Scassi Via Onofrio Scassi 1, I-16125 Genoa, Italy
[9] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci DISSAL, Via Pastore 1, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[10] Policlin San Martino, Breast Radiol, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[11] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, A27, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词:
Breast density;
Cancer detection;
False-positive recall;
Population screening;
Tomosynthesis;
Ultrasound;
DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY;
CANCER-DETECTION;
2D MAMMOGRAPHY;
US;
LEGISLATION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.029
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: Increased risk of breast cancer (BC) and increased risk of an interval BC at mammography screening are associated with high mammographic density. Adjunct imaging detects additional BCs not detected at mammography screening in women with dense breasts. Aim: The aim is to estimate the incremental cancer detection rate (CDR) and false-positive recall for each of tomosynthesis and ultrasound, as adjunct screening modalities in women with mammography-negative dense breasts. Methods: A multicentre prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2) recruited asymptomatic women attending Italian breast screening services. All participants had independently interpreted tomosynthesis and ultrasound. Outcomes were ascertained from excision histopathology or completed assessment. Paired binary data were compared using McNemar's test. Results: We recruited 5300 screening participants with median age of 50 (interquartile range 43-79) years who had negative mammography and dense breasts (April 2015-September 2017). Adjunct screening detected 29 additional BCs (27 invasive, 2 in situ): 12 detected on both tomosynthesis and ultrasound, 3 detected only on tomosynthesis, 14 detected only on ultrasound. Incremental CDR for tomosynthesis (+15 cancers) was 2.83/1000 screens (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58-4.67) versus ultrasound (+26 cancers) with an incremental CDR of 4.90/1000 screens (95% CI: 3.21-7.19), P = 0.015. Mean size of these cancers was 14.2 mm (standard deviation: 7.8 mm), and six had nodal metastases. Incremental false-positive recall was 1.22% (95% CI: 0.91%-1.49%) and differed significantly between tomosynthesis (0.30%) and ultrasound (1.0%), P < 0.001. Conclusions: Ultrasound detected more BCs but caused more false positives than tomosynthesis, underscoring trade-offs in screening outcomes when adjunct imaging is used for screening dense breasts. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
页数:8
相关论文