Are renewable energy technologies cost competitive for electricity generation?

被引:98
|
作者
Timilsina, Govinda R. [1 ]
机构
[1] World Bank Grp, Dev Res Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
Cost competitiveness of renewable energy; Electricity generation cost; Levelized cost of electricity; Renewable energy; Factors affecting electricity costs; SOLAR PV; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.088
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Renewable energy technologies (RETs), particularly solar and wind energy technologies, have experi-enced a rapid decline in their costs over the last two decades. Several studies claim that RETs are cost-competitive with fossil fuel technologies based on their levelized costs of electricity (LCOE), the most common indicator used to compare the cost competitiveness of electricity-generating technologies. However, no consensus exists due to the wide variations in factors influencing the LCOEs across countries and technologies. This study calculates more than 4000 LCOEs for 11 technologies, varying all input variables. It shows that the LCOEs for RETs, except concentrated solar and offshore wind, are lower than those for fossil fuel technologies at the lower range of capital costs and discount rates of 10% or lower. However, for a reasonable range of input variables, the study cannot justify the low auction prices for solar power, below US$20/MWh, recently observed in some parts of the world. The study illustrates how various factors influence the cost of electricity generation across technologies. It also compares the trends in electricity generation costs between RETs and fossil fuels over the last two decades. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 672
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Renewable energy sources for electricity generation in Mexico: A review
    Perez-Denicia, Eduardo
    Fernandez-Luqueno, Fabian
    Vilarino-Ayala, Darnes
    Manuel Montano-Zetina, Luis
    Alfonso Maldonado-Lopez, Luis
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 597 - 613
  • [32] An assessment of renewable energy potential for electricity generation in Pakistan
    Farooq, Muhammad Khalid
    Kumar, S.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 20 : 240 - 254
  • [33] Environmental Impact of Electricity Generation Technologies: A Comparison between Conventional, Nuclear, and Renewable Technologies
    Guidi, Giambattista
    Violante, Anna Carmela
    De Iuliis, Simona
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (23)
  • [34] Prospects of renewable energy utilisation for electricity generation in Bangladesh
    Hossain, A. K.
    Badr, O.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (08): : 1617 - 1649
  • [35] International and national renewable energy for electricity with optimal cost effective for electricity in Egypt
    Shouman, Enas R.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 77 : 916 - 923
  • [36] Comparative analysis of the environmental impacts of renewable electricity generation technologies in Rwanda
    Hakizimana E.
    Wali U.G.
    Sandoval D.
    Venant K.
    International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment, 2021, 22 (04) : 47 - 62
  • [37] A Hierarchy Grey Relational Analysis for Selecting the Renewable Electricity Generation Technologies
    Sarucan, Ahmet
    Baysal, M. Emin
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Engin, Orhan
    WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING, WCE 2011, VOL II, 2011, : 1149 - 1154
  • [38] A methodology for estimating health benefits of electricity generation using renewable technologies
    Partridge, Ian
    Gamkhar, Shama
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 39 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [39] Has renewable energy induced competitive behavior in the Spanish electricity market?
    Ciarreta, Aitor
    Paz Espinosa, Maria
    Pizarro-Irizar, Cristina
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 104 : 171 - 182
  • [40] A comprehensive review of variable renewable energy levelized cost of electricity
    Shen, Wei
    Chen, Xi
    Qiu, Jing
    Hayward, Jennifier A.
    Sayeef, Saad
    Osman, Peter
    Meng, Ke
    Dong, Zhao Yang
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 133