Warning Signs of Partner Abuse in Intimate Relationships: Gender Differences in Young Adults' Perceptions of Seriousness

被引:9
作者
Towler, Anna [1 ]
Eivers, Areana [2 ]
Frey, Ron [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Clin Psychol, Kelvin Grove, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Kelvin Grove Campus,Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Kelvin Grove, Australia
[4] Talera Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
intimate partner abuse; warning signs; young adults; gender differences; domestic violence; perceptions of domestic violence; ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS; EMERGING ADULTHOOD; PHYSICAL VIOLENCE; PREVENTION; ADOLESCENT; SYMMETRY; HEALTH; STIGMATIZATION; VICTIMIZATION; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1177/0886260517696869
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In response to the high rates of intimate partner abuse (IPA) among young adults and related negative health effects, this study examined 18- to 26-year-old Australians' perceptions of unhealthy partner behaviors that may constitute early warning signs of abuse in intimate relationships. This research is the first to examine gender differences on this issue in a young adult population. A convenience sample of 49 males and 152 females (N = 201) completed an online survey, rating how seriously they viewed a list of partner warning sign behaviors (WSBs). WSBs consisted of three subscales: Dominance-Possessiveness, Denigration, and Conflict-Retaliation. Participants' perceived seriousness of WSBs was analyzed by gender and WSB type. Results revealed large and significant gender differences in perceptions of WSBs, with females likely to rate all WSBs more seriously than males. Furthermore, females' responses were negatively skewed and leptokurtotic indicating high levels of convergence in the view that such behaviors are a concern. Analysis by WSB type revealed that conflict-retaliation behaviors were perceived most seriously by both genders, with more than half of males and 67% of females rating these as very serious. In contrast, significantly lower levels of perceived seriousness were observed for denigration and dominance-possessiveness behaviors. Half to two thirds of females viewed dominance-possessiveness and denigration WSBs as very serious, respectively, whereas just one third of males endorsed both these WSB types as very serious. Findings reveal that females have a heightened awareness of the subtle warning signs of abuse in intimate relationships and that as partner WSBs become more overt, both genders are more likely to recognize them as serious. Findings also indicate that subtler WSBs, such as control and denigration, are less readily identified as unhealthy, particularly among males.
引用
收藏
页码:1779 / 1802
页数:24
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PERS SAF AUSTR 2012
[2]  
Arnett JJ, 2000, AM PSYCHOL, V55, P469
[3]   Sex Differences in Response to Victimization by an Intimate Partner: More Stigmatization and Less Help-Seeking among Males [J].
Arnocky, Steven ;
Vaillancourt, Tracy .
JOURNAL OF AGGRESSION MALTREATMENT & TRAUMA, 2014, 23 (07) :705-724
[4]   Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates [J].
Burke, Sloane C. ;
Wallen, Michele ;
Vail-Smith, Karen ;
Knox, David .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (03) :1162-1167
[5]   Health consequences of intimate partner violence [J].
Campbell, JC .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9314) :1331-1336
[6]  
Catallozzi M, 2011, ARCH PEDIAT ADOL MED, V165, P313, DOI 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.32
[7]   THE MYTH OF SEXUAL SYMMETRY IN MARITAL VIOLENCE [J].
DOBASH, RP ;
DOBASH, RE ;
WILSON, M ;
DALY, M .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1992, 39 (01) :71-91
[8]   The control motive in intimate partner violence [J].
Felson, RB ;
Messner, SF .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2000, 63 (01) :86-94
[9]  
Follingstad D.R., 1990, J FAM VIOLENCE, V5, P107, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00978514
[10]   Sexual Orientation Disparities in History of Intimate Partner Violence: Results From the California Health Interview Survey [J].
Goldberg, Naomi G. ;
Meyer, Ilan H. .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2013, 28 (05) :1109-1118