Natural selection fluctuates at an extremely fine spatial scale inside a wild population of snapdragon plants

被引:9
作者
Marrot, Pascal [1 ]
Latutrie, Mathieu [1 ]
Piquet, Jesaelle [1 ]
Pujol, Benoit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perpignan, EPHE UPVD CNRS, USR 3278, PSL Univ Paris,CRIOBE, F-66860 Perpignan, France
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Antirrhinum majus L; environmental heterogeneity; fitness function; natural selection; snapdragon; spatial variation; PHENOTYPIC SELECTION; BIOMASS ALLOCATION; ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; ECOLOGICAL CAUSES; TRAITS; SIZE; ADAPTATION; PATTERNS; DENSITY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/evo.14359
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Spatial variation in natural selection is expected to shape phenotypic variation of wild populations and drive their evolution. Although evidence of phenotypic divergence across populations experiencing different selection regimes is abundant, investigations of intrapopulation variation in selection pressures remain rare. Fine-grained spatial environmental heterogeneity can be expected to influence selective forces within a wild population and thereby alter its fitness function by producing multiple fitness optima at a fine spatial scale. Here, we tested this hypothesis in a wild population of snapdragon plants living on an extremely small island in southern France (about 7500 m(2)). We estimated the spline-based fitness function linking individuals' fitness and five morphological traits in interaction with three spatially variable ecological drivers. We found that selection acting on several traits varied both in magnitude and direction in response to environmental variables at the scale of a meter. Our findings illustrate how different phenotypes can be selected at different locations within a population in response to environmental variation. Investigating spatial variation in selection within a population, in association with ecological conditions, represents an opportunity to identify putative ecological drivers of selection in the wild.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 666
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] Microgeographic adaptation and the spatial scale of evolution
    Richardson, Jonathan L.
    Urban, Mark C.
    Bolnick, Daniel I.
    Skelly, David K.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (03) : 165 - 176
  • [42] SCHLUTER D, 1988, EVOLUTION, V42, P849, DOI [10.2307/2408904, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02507.x]
  • [43] The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection
    Siepielski, Adam M.
    Gotanda, Kiyoko M.
    Morrissey, Michael B.
    Diamond, Sarah E.
    DiBattista, Joseph D.
    Carlson, Stephanie M.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 16 (11) : 1382 - 1392
  • [44] Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: Theory and practice
    Stinchcombe, JR
    Rutter, MT
    Burdick, DS
    Tiffin, P
    Rausher, MD
    Mauricio, R
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2002, 160 (04) : 511 - 523
  • [45] Patterns of floral colour neighbourhood and their effects on female reproductive success in an Antirrhinum hybrid zone
    Tastard, E.
    Ferdy, J. -B.
    Burrus, M.
    Thebaud, C.
    Andalo, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2012, 25 (02) : 388 - 399
  • [46] THE CAUSES OF NATURAL-SELECTION
    WADE, MJ
    KALISZ, S
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 1990, 44 (08) : 1947 - 1955
  • [47] Wood S.N., 2017, GEN ADDITIVE MODELS, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315370279