Patterns of care among patients undergoing hepatic resection: a query of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted hepatectomy database

被引:44
作者
Spolverato, Gaya [1 ]
Ejaz, Aslam [1 ]
Kim, Yuhree [1 ]
Hall, Bruce L. [2 ]
Bilimoria, Karl [3 ]
Cohen, Mark [4 ]
Ko, Clifford [5 ]
Pitt, Henry [6 ]
Pawlik, Timothy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Amer Coll Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
NSQIP; Hepatic resection; Outcomes; Surgery; HPB; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; LIVER RESECTION; MULTICENTER ANALYSIS; ACCURATE PREDICTOR; 50-50; CRITERIA; ACS-NSQIP; MORTALITY; RISK; VALIDATION; DRAINAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.016
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The American College of Surgeons recently added liver-specific variables to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). We sought to use these variables to define patterns of care, as well as characterize perioperative outcomes among patients undergoing hepatic resection. Methods: The American College of Surgeons-NSQIP database was queried for all patients undergoing hepatic resection between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 (n = 2448). Liver-specific variables were summarized. Results: Preoperatively, 11.3% of patients had hepatitis B or C or both, whereas 9.2% had cirrhosis. The indication for hepatic resection was benign (20.8%) or malignant (74.2%) disease. Among patients with a malignant indication, metastatic disease (47.3%) was more common than primary liver cancer (26.9%). Preoperative treatment included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (25.5%), portal vein embolization (2.1%), and intra-arterial therapy (0.9%). At surgery, most patients underwent an open hepatic resection (70.7%), whereas 21.4% and 1.1% underwent a laparoscopic or robotic procedure. The Pringle maneuver was used in 27.7% of patients. Although 6.5% of patients had a concomitant hepaticojejunostomy, 10.1% had a concurrent ablation. An operative drain was placed in half of patients (46.5%, minor resection: 42.0% versus major resection: 53.4%; P < 0.001). Among the entire cohort, bile leak (7.3%, minor resection: 4.9% versus major resection: 10.9%; P < 0.001) and liver insufficiency and/or failure (3.8%, minor resection: 1.9% versus major resection: 6.9%; P < 0.001) were relatively uncommon. A subset of patients (9.5%) did experience major liver-specific complications that required intervention (drainage of collection and/or abscess: 38.4%; stenting for biliary obstruction and/or leak: 21.2%; biloma drainage: 18.4%). Conclusions: In addition to standard variables, the new inclusion of liver-specific variables provides a unique opportunity to study NSQIP outcomes and practice patterns among patients undergoing hepatic resection. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 228
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] The "50-50 criteria" on postoperative day 5 - An accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy
    Balzan, S
    Belghiti, J
    Farges, O
    Ogata, S
    Sauvanet, A
    Delefosse, D
    Durand, F
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (06) : 824 - 829
  • [2] DRAINAGE AFTER ELECTIVE HEPATIC RESECTION - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    BELGHITI, J
    KABBEJ, M
    SAUVANET, A
    VILGRAIN, V
    PANIS, Y
    FEKETE, F
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (06) : 748 - 753
  • [3] Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: An update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection
    Belghiti, J
    Hiramatsu, K
    Benoist, S
    Massault, PP
    Sauvanet, A
    Farges, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 191 (01) : 38 - 46
  • [4] Blueprint for a New American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Birkmeyer, John D.
    Shahian, David M.
    Dimick, Justin B.
    Finlayson, Samuel R. G.
    Flum, David R.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Hall, Bruce Lee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (05) : 777 - 782
  • [5] Prospective evaluation of the International Study Group for Liver Surgery definition of bile leak after a liver resection and the role of routine operative drainage: an international multicentre study
    Brooke-Smith, Mark
    Figueras, Joan
    Ullah, Shahid
    Rees, Myrddin
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Hugh, Thomas J.
    Garden, O. James
    Fan, Sheung Tat
    Crawford, Michael
    Makuuchi, Masatoshi
    Yokoyama, Yukihiro
    Buechler, Marcus
    Weitz, Juergen
    Padbury, Robert
    [J]. HPB, 2015, 17 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [6] The role of peri-hepatic drain placement in liver surgery: a prospective analysis
    Butte, Jean M.
    Grendar, Jan
    Bathe, Oliver
    Sutherland, Francis
    Grondin, Sean
    Ball, Chad G.
    Dixon, Elijah
    [J]. HPB, 2014, 16 (10) : 936 - 942
  • [7] National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection
    Dimick, JB
    Wainess, RM
    Cowan, JA
    Upchurch, GR
    Knol, JA
    Colletti, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [8] Predictors of surgical site infection after liver resection: a multicentre analysis using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data
    Elola-Olaso, Almudena Moreno
    Davenport, Daniel L.
    Hundley, Jonathan C.
    Daily, Michael F.
    Gedaly, Roberto
    [J]. HPB, 2012, 14 (02) : 136 - 141
  • [9] Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection
    Fong, Y
    Brennan, MF
    Brown, K
    Heffernan, N
    Blumgart, LH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 171 (01) : 158 - 162
  • [10] Obesity, Diabetes, and Smoking are Important Determinants of Resource Utilization in Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis of 1029 Patients
    Gedaly, Roberto
    McHugh, Patrick P.
    Johnston, Thomas D.
    Jeon, Hoonbae
    Ranjan, Dinesh
    Davenport, Daniel L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 249 (03) : 414 - 419