Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: A Real-World Observational Study

被引:1
作者
Chane, Hsun-Hao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hung, Chi-Feng [3 ,4 ]
Chen, I-Chih [1 ]
Wu, Po-Ching [1 ]
Liu, Li-Wei [1 ]
Fang, Ching-Chang [1 ]
机构
[1] Tainan Municipal Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Show Chwan Med Care Corp, 670 Chongde Rd, Tainan 701033, Taiwan
[2] Fu Ten Catholic Univ, Dept Chem, New Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Fu Ten Catholic Univ, Grad Inst Biomed & Pharmaceut Sci, New Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Fu Ten Catholic Univ, Sch Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Major adverse cardiac events; New-generation drug-eluting stent; Stent thrombosis; Target lesion failure; Very small coronary artery disease; SMALL-VESSEL DISEASE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; COATED BALLOON; RISK; SIZE; EVEROLIMUS; INTERVENTION; POLYMER; REVASCULARIZATION; ANGIOPLASTY;
D O I
10.6515/ACS.202109_37(5).20210426A
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Treating vessels with a very small reference vessel diameter (RVD) in coronary artery disease is challenging. Objective: Long-term evaluation of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) for the treatment of coronary lesions with different RVDs. Methods: From April 2009 to March 2019, 780 patients who underwent single coronary stenting were divided into <= 2.25 (very small), 2.5-3.0 (small), and >= 3.5 mm (large) DES groups after 1:2:2 propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), and the secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and stent thrombosis (ST). Results: During 3 years after new-generation DES implantation, TLF and MACE rates were significantly lower in the very small DES group. The risk of TLF was significantly lower in the very small DES group compared to the small DES group [very small vs. small: TLF, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.282, p = 0.040]. The risks of MACEs and all-cause mortality were significantly lower in the very small DES group compared to the small DES group (very small vs. small: MACEs, adjusted HR = 0.215, p = 0.001; all-cause mortality, adjusted HR = 0.181, p = 0.005). The cumulative incidence rates of TLF-free (log-rank test p = 0.001) and MACE-free (log-rank test p < 0.001) survival were significantly different among the groups, and the very small DES group had a high event-free survival rate. No cases of ST occurred in any group. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the use of new-generation DESs for treating coronary lesions in very small vessels is safe and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 495
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Large and small vessels atherosclerosis: Similarities and differences
    Aboyans, Victor
    Lacroix, Philippe
    Criqui, Michael H.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2007, 50 (02) : 112 - 125
  • [2] Optimal Coronary Interventions in Small Vessels Is Size All That Matters?
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Garcia-Guimaraes, Marcos
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (13) : 1335 - 1337
  • [3] A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of drug-eluting stents
    Babapulle, MN
    Joseph, L
    Bélisle, P
    Brophy, JM
    Eisenberg, MJ
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9434) : 583 - 591
  • [4] Percutaneous coronary intervention for small vessel coronary artery disease
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
    Moretti, Claudio
    Abbate, Antonio
    Sheiban, Imad
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (03) : 189 - 198
  • [5] Performance of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent in Small Vessels
    Caputo, Ronald
    Leon, Martin
    Serruys, Patrick
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Yeung, Alan
    Windecker, Stephan
    Belardi, Jorge A.
    Silber, Sigmund
    Meredith, Ian
    Widimsky, Petr
    Saito, Shigeru
    Mauri, Laura
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 84 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [6] Impact of Lesion Length and Vessel Size on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Everolimus- Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Pooled Analysis From the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Smits, Pieter C.
    Kereiakes, Dean J.
    Parise, Helen
    Fahy, Martin
    Kedhi, Elvin
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Lansky, Alexandra J.
    Cristea, Ecaterina
    Sudhir, Krishnankutty
    Sood, Poornima
    Simonton, Charles A.
    Stone, Gregg W.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 4 (11) : 1209 - 1215
  • [7] Clinical end points in coronary stent trials - A case for standardized definitions
    Cutlip, Donald E.
    Windecker, Stephan
    Mehran, Roxana
    Boam, Ashley
    Cohen, David J.
    van Es, Gerrit-Anne
    Steg, P. Gabriel
    Morel, Marie-angele
    Mauri, Laura
    Vranckx, Pascal
    McFadden, Eugene
    Lansky, Alexandra
    Hamon, Martial
    Krucoff, Mitchell W.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (17) : 2344 - 2351
  • [8] Predictors of cardiac and noncardiac mortality among 14,697 patients with coronary heart disease
    Dankner, R
    Goldbourt, U
    Boyko, V
    Reicher-Reiss, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [9] Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement
    Elezi, S
    Kastrati, A
    Neumann, FJ
    Hadamitzky, M
    Dirschinger, J
    Schömig, A
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (18) : 1875 - 1880
  • [10] Are BVS suitable for ACS patients? Support from a large single center real live registry
    Felix, C. M.
    Onuma, Y.
    Fam, J. M.
    Diletti, R.
    Ishibashi, Y.
    Karanasos, A.
    Everaert, B. R. C.
    van Mieghem, N. M. D. A.
    Daemen, J.
    de Jaegere, P. P. T.
    Zijlstra, F.
    Regar, E. S.
    van Geuns, R. J. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 218 : 89 - 97