Generation Expansion Planning with Energy Storage Systems Considering Renewable Energy Generation Profiles and Full-Year Hourly Power Balance Constraints

被引:10
作者
Diewvilai, Radhanon [1 ]
Audomvongseree, Kulyos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Energy Res Inst, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词
generation expansion planning; power development plan; MILP decomposition; energy storage systems; CAPACITY EXPANSION; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; MULTIPERIOD; FLEXIBILITY; MITIGATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/en14185733
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a methodology to develop generation expansion plans considering energy storage systems (ESSs), individual generation unit characteristics, and full-year hourly power balance constraints. Generation expansion planning (GEP) is a complex optimization problem. To get a realistic plan with the lowest cost, acceptable system reliability, and satisfactory CO2 emissions for the coming decades, a complex multi-period mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model needs to be formulated and solved with individual unit characteristics along with hourly power balance constraints. This problem requires huge computational effort since there are thousands of possible scenarios with millions of variables in a single calculation. However, in this paper, instead of finding the globally optimal solutions of such MILPs directly, a simplification process is proposed, breaking it down into multiple LP subproblems, which are easier to solve. In each subproblem, constraints relating to renewable energy generation profiles, charge-discharge patterns of ESSs, and system reliability can be included. The proposed process is tested against Thailand's power development plan. The obtained solution is almost identical to that of the actual plan, but with less computational effort. The impacts of uncertainties as well as ESSs on GEP, e.g., system reliability, electricity cost, and CO2 emission, are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Power generation capacity planning under budget constraint in developing countries
    Afful-Dadzie, Anthony
    Afful-Dadzie, Eric
    Iddrisu, Awudu
    Banuro, Joseph Kwaku
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 188 : 71 - 82
  • [2] Multiobjective generation expansion planning considering power system adequacy
    Aghaei, Jamshid
    Akbari, Mohammad Amin
    Roosta, Alireza
    Baharvandi, Amir
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2013, 102 : 8 - 19
  • [3] A dynamic model for coordination of generation and transmission expansion planning in power systems
    Alizadeh, Behnam
    Jadid, Shahram
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2015, 65 : 408 - 418
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1984, RELIABILITY EVALUATI, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-1860-4
  • [5] Accounting for flexibility in power system planning with renewables
    Belderbos, Andreas
    Delarue, Erik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2015, 71 : 33 - 41
  • [6] OPTIMAL GENERATION PLANNING CONSIDERING UNCERTAINTY
    BOOTH, RR
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1972, PA91 (01): : 70 - &
  • [7] Power System Capacity Expansion Under Higher Penetration of Renewables Considering Flexibility Constraints and Low Carbon Policies
    Chen, Xinyu
    Lv, Jiajun
    McElroy, Michael B.
    Han, Xingning
    Nielsen, Chris P.
    Wen, Jinyu
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (06) : 6240 - 6253
  • [8] Economic Dispatch of Multiple Energy Storage Systems Under Different Characteristics
    Choi, Jongwoo
    Park, Wan-Ki
    Lee, Il-Woo
    [J]. POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, (CPESE 2017), 2017, 141 : 216 - 221
  • [9] Energy Policy and Planning Office, SUMM THAIL POW DEV P
  • [10] A comprehensive review on expansion planning: Models and tools for energy policy analysis
    Gacitua, L.
    Gallegos, P.
    Henriquez-Auba, R.
    Lorca, A.
    Negrete-Pincetic, M.
    Olivares, D.
    Valenzuela, A.
    Wenzel, G.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 98 : 346 - 360