Effect of block play on language acquisition and attention in toddlers - A pilot Randomized controlled trial

被引:36
作者
Christakis, Dimitri A.
Zimmerman, Frederick J.
Garrison, Michelle M.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Inst Child Hlth, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE | 2007年 / 161卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.161.10.967
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To test the hypotheses that block play improves language acquisition and attention. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Pediatric clinic. Participants: Children aged 11/2 to 21/2 years. Intervention: Distribution of 2 sets of building blocks. Main Outcome Measures: Scores on the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, television viewing based on diary data, and the hyperactivity domain of the Child Behavior Checklist. Results: Of 220 families approached in the clinic waiting room, 175 (80%) agreed to participate in the study. At least 1 diary was returned from 92 of the 175 families (53%). A total of 140 families (80%) completed exit interviews. Of the children in the intervention group, 52 (59%) had block play reported in their diaries compared with 11 (13%) in the control group ( P < .01). The linear regression results for language acquisition were as follows: entire sample - raw score, 7.52 (P = .07); percentile, 8.4 (P = .15); low-income sample - raw score, 12.40 (P = .01); percentile, 14.94 (P = .03). For attention the results were as follows: entire sample - odds ratio, 0.49 ( P=. 29); low-income sample - odds ratio, 0.48 (P= .26) There were no statistically significant differences with respect to hyperactivity scores. Conclusions: Distribution of blocks can lead to improved language development in middle- and low-income children. Further research is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 971
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Achenbach system of empirically based assessment: Caregiver-teacher report form for ages 1-5
[2]  
[Anonymous], NEUR NEIGHB SCI EARL
[3]  
Bar-on ME, 2001, PEDIATRICS, V107, P423, DOI 10.1542/peds.107.2.423
[4]   Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD [J].
Barkley, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (01) :65-94
[5]   Prevalence and assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in primary care settings [J].
Brown, RT ;
Freeman, WS ;
Perrin, JM ;
Stein, MT ;
Amler, RW ;
Feldman, HM ;
Pierce, K ;
Wolraich, ML .
PEDIATRICS, 2001, 107 (03) :E43
[6]   Central spatial structures and their development [J].
Case, R ;
Stephenson, KM ;
Bleiker, C ;
Okamoto, Y .
MONOGRAPHS OF THE SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 61 (1-2) :103-130
[7]  
Case R., 1992, MINDS STAIRCASE EXPL
[8]   Television, video, and computer game usage in children under 11 years of age [J].
Christakis, DA ;
Ebee, BE ;
Rivara, FP ;
Zimmerman, FJ .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2004, 145 (05) :652-656
[9]   Early television exposure and subsequent attentional problems in children [J].
Christakis, DA ;
Zimmerman, FJ ;
DiGiuseppe, DL ;
McCarty, CA .
PEDIATRICS, 2004, 113 (04) :708-713
[10]   Concurrent and predictive validity of parent reports of child language at ages 2 and 3 years [J].
Feldman, HM ;
Dale, PS ;
Campbell, TF ;
Colborn, DK ;
Kurs-Lasky, M ;
Rockette, HE ;
Paradise, JL .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 76 (04) :856-868