Model-Predicted Performance of Second-Trimester Down Syndrome Screening With Sonographic Prenasal Thickness

被引:28
|
作者
Miguelez, Javier [3 ]
Moskovitch, Miki [2 ]
Cuckle, Howard [1 ]
Zugaib, Marcelo [3 ]
Bunduki, Victor [3 ]
Maymon, Ron [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Assaf Harofe Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Zerifin, Israel
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Down syndrome; model prediction; prenasal thickness; screening; sonography; GENETIC SONOGRAM; RISK; ULTRASOUND; TRISOMY-21; FETUSES; MARKERS; LENGTH; AGE;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2010.29.12.1741
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to estimate the Down syndrome detection and false-positive rates for second-trimester sonographic prenasal thickness (PT) measurement alone and in combination with other markers. Methods. Multivariate log Gaussian modeling was performed using numerical integration. Parameters for the PT distribution, in multiples of the normal gestation-specific median (MoM), were derived from 105 Down syndrome and 1385 unaffected pregnancies scanned at 14 to 27 weeks. The data included a new series of 25 cases and 535 controls combined with 4 previously published series. The means were estimated by the median and the SDs by the 10th to 90th range divided by 2.563. Parameters for other markers were obtained from the literature. Results. A log Gaussian model fitted the distribution of PT values well in Down syndrome and unaffected pregnancies. The distribution parameters were as follows: Down syndrome, mean, 1.334 MoM; log(10) SD, 0.0772; unaffected pregnancies, 0.995 and 0.0752, respectively. The model-predicted detection rates for 1%, 3%, and 5% false-positive rates for PT alone were 35%, 51%, and 60%, respectively. The addition of PT to a 4 serum marker protocol increased detection by 14% to 18% compared with serum alone. The simultaneous sonographic measurement of PT and nasal bone length increased detection by 19% to 26%, and with a third sonographic marker, nuchal skin fold, performance was comparable with first-trimester protocols. Conclusions. Second-trimester screening with sonographic PT and serum markers is predicted to have a high detection rate, and further sonographic markers could perform comparably with first-trimester screening protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:1741 / 1747
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Second-trimester Down syndrome maternal serum screening in twin pregnancies: impact of chorionicity
    Muller, FO
    Dreux, S
    Dupoizat, H
    Uzan, S
    Dubin, MF
    Oury, JF
    Dingeon, B
    Dommergues, M
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2003, 23 (04) : 331 - 335
  • [32] Fetal facial sonographic markers for second trimester Down syndrome screening in a Thai population
    Sooklim, Ratchadawan
    Manotaya, Saknan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 111 (02) : 144 - 147
  • [33] A machine learning model for the prediction of down syndrome in second trimester antenatal screening
    He, Falin
    Lin, Bo
    Mou, Kai
    Jin, Lizi
    Liu, Juntao
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2021, 521 : 206 - 211
  • [34] Cut-off criteria for second-trimester nuchal skinfold thickness for prenatal detection of Down syndrome in a Thai population
    Tannirandorn, Y
    Manotaya, S
    Uerpairojkit, B
    Tanawattanacharoen, S
    Charoenvidhya, D
    Phaosavasdi, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1999, 65 (02) : 137 - 141
  • [35] Nuchal translucence incorporated into a one-stage multifactorial screening model for down syndrome prediction at second-trimester pregnancy
    Hung, JH
    Fu, CY
    Yuan, CC
    Chen, CL
    Yang, ML
    Shu, LP
    Wu, CC
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 29 (12) : 1667 - 1674
  • [36] Screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy
    O'Leary, Peter
    Maxwell, Susannah
    Sinosich, Michael
    Devoss, Kerry
    Fletcher, Janice
    Ranieri, Enzo
    Metz, Michael P.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 (01) : 19 - 21
  • [37] Comparison of the efficiency of second-trimester nasal bone hypoplasia and increased nuchal fold in Down syndrome screening
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Sehdev, Harish M.
    Gerkowicz, Sabrina
    Stamilio, David M.
    Macones, George A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (03) : 281.e1 - 281.e5
  • [38] Role of the second-trimester "genetic sonogram' for Down syndrome screen in the era of first-trimester screening and noninvasive prenatal testing
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Ghidini, Alessandro
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 34 (06) : 511 - 517
  • [39] The performance of second trimester long bone ratios for Down syndrome screening is influenced by gestational age
    Wang, Eileen
    Chen, Catherine
    Glimco, Elizabeth
    Grobman, William
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 23 (07) : 642 - 645
  • [40] Screening for Down Syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population
    Rozenberg, P.
    Bussieres, L.
    Chevret, S.
    Bemard, J.-P.
    Malagrida, L.
    Cuckle, H.
    Chabry, C.
    Durand-Zaleski, I.
    Bidat, L.
    Lacroix, I.
    Moulis, M.
    Roger, M.
    Jacquernotic, M. -C.
    Bault, J. -P.
    Boukobza, P.
    Boccaram, P.
    Vialat, F.
    Giudicelli, Y.
    Ville, Y.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2007, 35 (04): : 303 - 311