Model-Predicted Performance of Second-Trimester Down Syndrome Screening With Sonographic Prenasal Thickness

被引:28
|
作者
Miguelez, Javier [3 ]
Moskovitch, Miki [2 ]
Cuckle, Howard [1 ]
Zugaib, Marcelo [3 ]
Bunduki, Victor [3 ]
Maymon, Ron [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Assaf Harofe Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Zerifin, Israel
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Down syndrome; model prediction; prenasal thickness; screening; sonography; GENETIC SONOGRAM; RISK; ULTRASOUND; TRISOMY-21; FETUSES; MARKERS; LENGTH; AGE;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2010.29.12.1741
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to estimate the Down syndrome detection and false-positive rates for second-trimester sonographic prenasal thickness (PT) measurement alone and in combination with other markers. Methods. Multivariate log Gaussian modeling was performed using numerical integration. Parameters for the PT distribution, in multiples of the normal gestation-specific median (MoM), were derived from 105 Down syndrome and 1385 unaffected pregnancies scanned at 14 to 27 weeks. The data included a new series of 25 cases and 535 controls combined with 4 previously published series. The means were estimated by the median and the SDs by the 10th to 90th range divided by 2.563. Parameters for other markers were obtained from the literature. Results. A log Gaussian model fitted the distribution of PT values well in Down syndrome and unaffected pregnancies. The distribution parameters were as follows: Down syndrome, mean, 1.334 MoM; log(10) SD, 0.0772; unaffected pregnancies, 0.995 and 0.0752, respectively. The model-predicted detection rates for 1%, 3%, and 5% false-positive rates for PT alone were 35%, 51%, and 60%, respectively. The addition of PT to a 4 serum marker protocol increased detection by 14% to 18% compared with serum alone. The simultaneous sonographic measurement of PT and nasal bone length increased detection by 19% to 26%, and with a third sonographic marker, nuchal skin fold, performance was comparable with first-trimester protocols. Conclusions. Second-trimester screening with sonographic PT and serum markers is predicted to have a high detection rate, and further sonographic markers could perform comparably with first-trimester screening protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:1741 / 1747
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bedside estimation of Down syndrome risk from second-trimester ultrasound prenasal thickness
    Maymon, R.
    Moskovitch, M.
    Levinsohn-Tavor, O.
    Weinraub, Z.
    Herman, A.
    Cuckle, H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 34 (06) : 629 - 633
  • [2] Predictive role of prenasal thickness and nasal bone for Down syndrome in the second trimester
    Ozcan, Tulin
    Ozlu, Tulay
    Allen, Julie
    Peterson, Jeanne
    Pressman, Eva K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 171 (02) : 220 - 224
  • [3] Second trimester ultrasound prenasal thickness combined with nasal bone length: a new method of Down syndrome screening
    Maymon, R
    Levinsohn-Tavor, O
    Cuckle, H
    Tovbin, Y
    Dreazen, E
    Wiener, Y
    Herman, A
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (10) : 906 - 911
  • [4] A model for second-trimester Down syndrome sonographic screening based on facial landmarks and digit length measurement
    Maymon, R
    Ushakov, F
    Waisman, D
    Cuckle, H
    Tovbin, Y
    Herman, A
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 27 (03) : 290 - 295
  • [5] Role of Second-Trimester Genetic Sonography After Down Syndrome Screening
    Aagaard-Tillery, Kjersti M.
    Malone, Fergal D.
    Nyberg, David A.
    Porter, T. Flint
    Cuckle, Howard S.
    Fuchs, Karin
    Sullivan, Lisa
    Comstock, Christine H.
    Saade, George R.
    Eddleman, Keith
    Gross, Susan
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    Craigo, Sabrina D.
    Timor-Tritsch, Ilan E.
    Carr, Stephen R.
    Wolfe, Honor M.
    Bianchi, Diana W.
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (06) : 1189 - 1196
  • [6] Prenasal thickness in first-trimester screening for Down syndrome
    Miron, Jean-Philippe
    Cuckle, Howard
    Miron, Pierre
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2012, 32 (07) : 695 - 697
  • [7] Prenasal thickness to nasal bone length ratio: effectiveness as a second or third trimester marker for Down syndrome
    Tournemire, A.
    Groussolles, M.
    Ehlinger, V.
    Lusque, A.
    Morin, M.
    Benevent, J. B.
    Arnaud, C.
    Vayssiere, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 191 : 28 - 32
  • [8] Role of second-trimester ultrasound in screening for Down syndrome
    Cuckle, H.
    Maymon, R.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 41 (03) : 241 - 244
  • [9] Are second-trimester minor sonographic markers for Down syndrome useful in patients who have undergone first-trimester combined screening?
    Sood, Monica
    Rochelson, Burton
    Krantz, David
    Ravens, Rachel
    Tam, Hima Tam
    Vohra, Nidhi
    Lewis, Dawnette
    Ray, Bidisha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (04) : 408.e1 - 408.e4
  • [10] Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    Bussieres, Laurence
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Bernard, Jean Pierre
    Malagrida, Lydia
    Cuckle, Howard
    Chabry, Chantal
    Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
    Bidat, Laurent
    Lacroix, Isabelle
    Moutis, Max
    Roger, Marc
    Jacquemot, Christine
    Bault, Jean Philippe
    Boukobza, Philippe
    Boccara, Patrick
    Vialard, Francois
    Giudicelli, Yves
    Ville, Yves
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (05) : 1379 - 1387