The Effect of Socially Responsible HRM on Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Proactive Motivation Model

被引:24
作者
He, Junqian [1 ]
Kim, Hyosun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Chung Ang Business Sch, Seoul 06974, South Korea
关键词
socially responsible human resource management; organizational citizenship behavior for the environment; moral efficacy; felt obligation; empathy; proactive motivation theory; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; EMPATHY; IDENTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; ROLES; CONSEQUENCES; OBLIGATION; ENGAGEMENT; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.3390/su13147958
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many organizations face the important challenges of motivating employees effectively to participate in corporate social responsibility initiatives and maintaining socially responsible human resource management practices. We examine whether socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) practices can affect employees' social responsibility-related behaviors, such as organizational citizenship behavior for the environment (OCBE). Based on proactive motivation theory, we propose a multiple-mediation model, selecting moral efficacy, felt obligation, and empathy as the mediators. We analyzed data from a sample of 535 employees from 23 manufacturing companies in China. The results show that SRHRM practices have a significant positive effect on OCBE. We also found that moral efficacy, felt obligation, and empathy significantly mediate the effect of SRHRM practices on OCBE and that there is no significant difference among the three mediation paths. Our study suggests that organizational pursuit of the socially responsible human resource management practices is an effective pathway to make employees feel more responsible toward global sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: The influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion [J].
Afsar, Bilal ;
Badir, Yuosre ;
Kiani, Umar Safdar .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 45 :79-88
[2]   Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Williams, Cynthia A. ;
Ganapathi, Jyoti .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863
[3]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[4]   Corporate Social Responsibility at the Micro-Level as a "New Organizational Value" for Sustainability: Are Females More Aligned towards It? [J].
Ahmad, Naveed ;
Ullah, Zia ;
Mahmood, Asif ;
Ariza-Montes, Antonio ;
Vega-Munoz, Alejandro ;
Han, Heesup ;
Scholz, Miklas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (04) :1-14
[5]  
Albrecht Simon L., 2012, International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, V4, P277
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Multivariate Data
[7]   SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY AND THE ORGANIZATION [J].
ASHFORTH, BE ;
MAEL, F .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (01) :20-39
[8]   UNDERSTANDING INDIVIDUAL COMPASSION IN ORGANIZATIONS: THE ROLE OF APPRAISALS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY [J].
Atkins, Paul W. B. ;
Parker, Sharon K. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 37 (04) :524-546
[9]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[10]   Trust in Supervisor and Job Engagement: Mediating Effects of Psychological Safety and Felt Obligation [J].
Basit, Ameer A. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 151 (08) :701-721