Exploring the Association Between USMLE Scores and ACGME Milestone Ratings: A Validity Study Using National Data From Emergency Medicine

被引:8
作者
Hamstra, Stanley J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cuddy, Monica M. [4 ]
Jurich, Daniel [4 ]
Yamazaki, Kenji [1 ]
Burkhardt, John [5 ]
Holmboe, Eric S. [1 ]
Barone, Michael A. [4 ]
Santen, Sally A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Accreditat Council Grad Med Educ, Milestones Res & Evaluat, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med Educ, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Natl Board Med Examiners, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Emergency Med & Learning Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Emergency Med, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
PERFORMANCE; INFERENCES; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000004207
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) sequence and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones represent 2 major components along the continuum of assessment from undergraduate through graduate medical education. This study examines associations between USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores and ACGME emergency medicine (EM) milestone ratings. Method In February 2019, subject matter experts (SMEs) provided judgments of expected associations for each combination of Step examination and EM subcompetency. The resulting sets of subcompetencies with expected strong and weak associations were selected for convergent and discriminant validity analysis, respectively. National-level data for 2013-2018 were provided; the final sample included 6,618 EM residents from 158 training programs. Empirical bivariate correlations between milestone ratings and Step scores were calculated, then those correlations were compared with the SMEs' judgments. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted on the selected subcompetencies, in which milestone ratings were the dependent variable, and Step 1 score, Step 2 CK score, and cohort year were independent variables. Results Regression results showed small but statistically significant positive relationships between Step 2 CK score and the subcompetencies (regression coefficients ranged from 0.02 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.03] to 0.12 [95% CI, 0.11-0.13]; all P < .05), with the degree of association matching the SMEs' judgments for 7 of the 9 selected subcompetencies. For example, a 1 standard deviation increase in Step 2 CK score predicted a 0.12 increase in MK-01 milestone rating, when controlling for Step 1. Step 1 score showed a small statistically significant effect with only the MK-01 subcompetency (regression coefficient = 0.06 [95% CI, 0.05-0.07], P < .05). Conclusions These results provide incremental validity evidence in support of Step 1 and Step 2 CK score and EM milestone rating uses.
引用
收藏
页码:1324 / 1331
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] American Educational Research Association
  • [2] American Psychological Association
  • [3] National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
  • [4] Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Milestones: Initial Formulation and Future Directions
    Ames, S. Elizabeth
    Ponce, Brent A.
    Marsh, J. Lawrence
    Hamstra, Stanley J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (01) : E1 - E8
  • [5] Beeson Michael S, 2017, J Grad Med Educ, V9, P716, DOI 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00304.1
  • [6] Initial Validity Analysis of the Emergency Medicine Milestones
    Beeson, Michael S.
    Holmboe, Eric S.
    Korte, Robert C.
    Nasca, Thomas J.
    Brigham, Timothy
    Russ, Chad M.
    Whitley, Cameron T.
    Reisdorff, Earl J.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (07) : 838 - 844
  • [7] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX
    CAMPBELL, DT
    FISKE, DW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) : 81 - 105
  • [8] The Effect and Use of Milestones in the Assessment of Neurological Surgery Residents and Residency Programs
    Conforti, Lisa N.
    Yaghmour, Nicholas A.
    Hamstra, Stanley J.
    Holmboe, Eric S.
    Kennedy, Benjamin
    Liu, Jesse J.
    Waldo, Heidi
    Selden, Nathan R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 75 (01) : 147 - 155
  • [9] A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework
    Cook, David A.
    Brydges, Ryan
    Ginsburg, Shiphra
    Hatala, Rose
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 49 (06) : 560 - 575
  • [10] Assessing the validity of the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge examination through an evaluation of its clinical relevance
    Cuddy, MM
    Dillon, GF
    Clauser, BE
    Holtzman, KZ
    Margolis, MJ
    McEllhenney, SM
    Swanson, DB
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2004, 79 (10) : S43 - S45