Is valuing nature contributing to policy development?

被引:5
作者
Burney, J [1 ]
机构
[1] English Nat, Peterborough PE1 1UA, England
关键词
nature; biodiversity valuation; ecosystem functions; cost-benefit;
D O I
10.3197/096327100129342182
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines technical, ethical and ecological science perspectives on environmental valuation, and discusses problems in terms of the implications for practical policy-making. It suggests that all these perspectives raise legitimate concerns about the use of stated preference methods, but concludes that such methods still have a role to play in policy making for nature conservation provided they are applied in the right circumstances, designed very carefully, and used in conjunction with other decision-making tools.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 520
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Ecological Economics
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, NEW DEAL TRUNK ROADS
[3]  
BOWERS J, 2000, ECOS, V20, P61
[4]  
*CAG L CONS, 1997, ENV CAP PROV GUID
[5]   I struggled with this money business: respondents' perspectives on contingent valuation [J].
Clark, J ;
Burgess, J ;
Harrison, CM .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 33 (01) :45-62
[6]  
Daily G.C., 2013, NATURES SERVICES SOC, P454, DOI [10.12987/9780300188479-039/html, DOI 10.12987/9780300188479-039/HTML, 10.12987/9780300188479-039]
[7]  
De Groot RudolfS., 1992, FUNCTIONS NATURE EVA
[8]  
GREEN C, 1997, ARE BLUE WHALES REAL
[9]  
GREGORIE DC, 1999, ECOLOGICAL EC, V29, P179
[10]  
HAINESYOUNG R, 1999, 355 ENGL NAT RES