Evaluation of whitefly-mediated inoculation techniques to screen Lycopersicon esculentum and wild relatives for resistance to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus

被引:84
|
作者
Picó, B [1 ]
Díez, M [1 ]
Nuez, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn Agron, Dept Biotecnol Genet, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
Bemisia tabaci; inoculation techniques; Lycopersicon spp; resistance; TYLCV;
D O I
10.1023/A:1018353806051
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
For two consecutive years nine hybrids and three varieties of tomato, four Lycopersicon peruvianum and four Lycopersicon chilense accessions were screened for Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) resistance. Three inoculation techniques using Bemisia tabaci, the vector of TYLCV, were compared: (1) artificial mass inoculation-simultaneous infection of cultivated and wild material in greenhouses; (2) artificial cage inoculation-individual infection in insect-proof cages; (3) natural field infection. Artificial inoculations led to higher levels of infection, but different patterns of response to each inoculation technique were found depending on the resistance level. Tomato varieties showed an important fruit set reduction after both artificial and natural inoculations. In contrast, field infection was milder in tomato hybrids, in which yield was barely affected. These hybrids showed a wide range of reactions with the two artificial inoculation techniques, but infection was always more severe after mass inoculation. Extreme severity of mass infection made it difficult to differentiate among variable degrees of resistance that were more reliably detected with cage inoculation. The hybrids F3524, F3522, Fiona, and Tyking showed the highest level of resistance. F3524 and F3522 had an acceptable yield in field and cage assays, but their resistance collapsed under massive conditions of infection. Tyking and Fiona exhibited the best response in all conditions, although their yield was moderately reduced in mass assays. Mass inoculation was not adequate for the screening of wild Lycopersicon. Some susceptible plants escaped infection, probably as a consequence of non-preference mechanisms and loss of vector infectivity. Individual inoculation in cages prevented the risk of non-infection, ensuring 100% disease incidence. This technique allowed the selection of highly resistant wild sources. L. chilense LA 1969 and LA 1963 had the highest level of resistance with the three inoculation techniques. L. peruvianum PI-126944 and L. chilense LA 1932, which were only tested in mass and field conditions, also exhibited a promising response. The results proved that the inoculation technique influences the response of tomato and wild Lycopersicon spp to TYLCV. It is concluded that artificial cage inoculation, although more time-consuming, is the most efficient, adequate, and reliable technique to screen both cultivated and wild Lycopersicon species for resistance to TYLCV.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 271
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of whitefly-mediated inoculation techniques to screen Lycopersicon esculentum and wild relatives for resistance to Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
    Belén Picó
    Ma. José Díez
    Fernando Nuez
    Euphytica, 1998, 101 : 259 - 271
  • [2] Sweet pepper confirmed as a reservoir host for tomato yellow leaf curl virus by both agro-inoculation and whitefly-mediated inoculation
    Kil, Eui-Joon
    Byun, Hee-Seong
    Kim, Sunhoo
    Kim, Jaedeok
    Park, Jungan
    Cho, Seungchan
    Yang, Dong-Cheol
    Lee, Kyeong-Yeoll
    Choi, Hong-Soo
    Kim, Ji-Kwang
    Lee, Sukchan
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2014, 159 (09) : 2387 - 2395
  • [3] Resistance to Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus in Tomato Germplasm
    Yan, Zhe
    Perez-de-Castro, Ana
    Diez, Maria J.
    Hutton, Samuel F.
    Visser, Richard G. F.
    Wolters, Anne-Marie A.
    Bai, Yuling
    Li, Junming
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 9
  • [4] Screening additional wild tomatoes for resistance to the whitefly-borne tomato yellow leaf curl virus
    Meir Pilowsky
    Shlomo Cohen
    Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2000, 22 : 351 - 353
  • [5] Comparison of resistance to Tomato leaf curl virus (India) and Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (Israel) among Lycopersicon wild species, breeding lines and hybrids
    Midatharahally Narasegowda Maruthi
    Henryk Czosnek
    Favi Vidavski
    Shlomo-Yedidia Tarba
    Judith Milo
    Shai Leviatov
    Hagalawadi Mallithimmaiah Venkatesh
    Attiganal Seetharam Padmaja
    Rudrappa Subbappa Kulkarni
    Venkataramappa Muniyappa
    European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2003, 109 (1) : 1 - 11
  • [6] Comparison of resistance to Tomato leaf curl virus (India) and Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (Israel) among Lycopersicon wild species, breeding lines and hybrids
    Maruthi, MN
    Czosnek, H
    Vidavski, F
    Tarba, SY
    Milo, J
    Leviatov, S
    Venkatesh, HM
    Padmaja, AS
    Kulkarni, RS
    Muniyappa, V
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2003, 109 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [7] Screening additional wild tomatoes for resistance to the whitefly-borne tomato yellow leaf curl virus
    Pilowsky, M
    Cohen, S
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2000, 22 (03) : 351 - 353
  • [8] Detection and molecular characterization of tomato yellow leaf curl virus naturally infecting Lycopersicon esculentum in Egypt
    Rabie, M.
    Ratti, C.
    Aleem, E. Abdel
    Fattouh, F.
    ACTA VIROLOGICA, 2017, 61 (03) : 252 - 263
  • [9] REACTION OF LYCOPERSICON CULTIVARS AND WILD ACCESSIONS TO TOMATO LEAF CURL VIRUS
    MUNIYAPPA, V
    JALIKOP, SH
    SAIKIA, AK
    CHENNARAYAPPA
    SHIVASHANKAR, G
    BHAT, AI
    RAMAPPA, HK
    EUPHYTICA, 1991, 56 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [10] Tomato Plant Flavonoids Increase Whitefly Resistance and Reduce Spread of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
    Yao, Qixi
    Peng, Zhengke
    Tong, Hong
    Yang, Fengbo
    Xing, Gaoshan
    Wang, Linjiang
    Zheng, Jiangjie
    Zhang, Youjun
    Su, Qi
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2019, 112 (06) : 2790 - 2796